Tony Rizzo Blasts Kevin Stefanski: Did the Browns Deliberately Sabotage Shedeur Sanders?

Tony Rizzo Blasts Browns Coaching: Shedeur Sanders Set Up to Fail

The Cleveland Browns’ season ended in predictable frustration, and veteran NFL analyst Tony Rizzo didn’t hold back. In a heated postgame rant, Rizzo tore into the Browns’ coaching staff, quarterback development, and overall organizational dysfunction, leaving little doubt about where he believes the blame lies.

.

.

.


Pathetic Play-Calling Costs the Browns

“This is pathetic,” Rizzo began, referencing a critical play in Cleveland’s loss to the Buffalo Bills. “The play-calling in a situation like that is pathetic. And it’s because your head coach has his head buried in a play sheet and he’s not coaching the game.”

Rizzo didn’t mince words, expressing outright frustration with the team’s leadership. “I’m done with the whole process. When you draft the Lord’s Savior Jesus Christ next April and he goes 15-2, I’ll say I was wrong,” he added, highlighting his belief that the blame lies far above the quarterback position.

The Browns’ offensive struggles weren’t a one-game anomaly. Rizzo pointed to Joe Flacco and Dylan Gabriel, both of whom appeared lost in Kevin Stefanski’s offense. “This offense is garbage. The coaching is garbage. Cleveland is a dumpster fire,” he concluded bluntly.


Facing a Playoff-Caliber Team with a Rookie-Laden Roster

Rizzo turned his focus to the context of Cleveland’s matchup against Buffalo, a team packed with playoff-tested veterans. Meanwhile, the Browns fielded a roster full of rookies, including at quarterback, with an offensive line missing every starter.

“And did anyone acknowledge this?” Rizzo asked, frustration dripping from his words. “No one on the postgame shows said, ‘Wow, we’re playing probably the best team in the AFC with a bunch of rookies.’”

The numbers paint a grim picture. Shedeur Sanders, the rookie quarterback, had his lowest time to throw all season at 2.7 seconds—but this wasn’t a sign of brilliance. Instead, it was the result of coaching instructions: get the ball out immediately. “He became a checkdown machine,” Rizzo explained. “He did exactly what they told him. And guess what? He looked worse than ever.”


Is It the Quarterback or the Coaching?

Rizzo’s point was clear: the problem isn’t Sanders. “This is a pattern,” he said. “Joe Flacco looked lost. Dylan Gabriel looked neutered. Both veteran and young quarterbacks have appeared to forget how to play football in Stefanski’s system. This isn’t a coincidence. This is systematic failure.”

He was particularly scathing of Stefanski, who serves as both head coach and offensive coordinator. “He’s running one of the worst offensive schemes in the NFL,” Rizzo declared. The statistics back him up: after winning at a 55.2% clip in his first four seasons, Stefanski has collapsed to a shocking 18.8% in the past two years. “No coach in NFL history has fallen this steep,” Rizzo emphasized.


The Rookie Quarterback Dilemma

Despite the failures, Cleveland’s fans and media are quick to blame Sanders, a rookie playing behind backups and inexperienced receivers. “The kid is playing with practice squad players. His top receivers yesterday were 22-year-old Raheem Sanders, Malachi Corley, Harold Fannon Jr., and Tayvon Williams. These are kids fighting for roster spots, not established NFL weapons,” Rizzo said.

Expecting perfection under these conditions is, in Rizzo’s words, “insanity.” Sanders has played just five games in these circumstances. “How in the hell would you know if he’s the answer?” he asked rhetorically.

Tony Rizzo (YT Screengrab) - Barrett Media


Stefanski’s Quarterback Graveyard

The problem, Rizzo argued, is the system, not the quarterback. Cleveland has a long history of quarterback mismanagement, and Stefanski is the latest to perpetuate the cycle. Baker Mayfield entered Cleveland confident and swaggering, only to leave broken. Joe Flacco, a Super Bowl MVP, looked washed in Stefanski’s system before thriving elsewhere. Dylan Gabriel was coached into hesitation, unable to push the ball downfield. And now Sanders is following the same pattern.

Stefanski’s philosophy seems to be about minimizing mistakes rather than maximizing potential. “Don’t lose the game, don’t turn the ball over, don’t let your playmakers make plays. That’s how you ruin a franchise quarterback,” Rizzo explained.


What Other Teams Do Differently

Rizzo compared Cleveland’s approach to what the Buffalo Bills did with Josh Allen. “They didn’t try to force Allen into a rigid system. They built the offense around him, let him take chances, let him grow,” Rizzo said. In Cleveland, the opposite occurs: every quarterback is forced into a system that stifles creativity, then blamed for failing.

This systemic dysfunction is compounded by poor roster construction. The Browns’ offensive line has been a revolving door, and their receiving corps is inconsistent. Even with raw talent, the system sets quarterbacks up to fail.


Future Uncertainty: GM and Coach Decisions

Leaked reports suggest no decision has been made about Stefanski’s future, which Rizzo described as “absolutely insane.” General Manager Andrew Berry, responsible for personnel failures in both the quarterback and receiver positions, will reportedly play a central role in determining the team’s direction.

Rizzo’s critique of the front office was unflinching. “The Browns are asking Sanders, or whoever they draft next, to do something that’s never been done correctly in modern Cleveland history: get the coach right, get the GM right, and get the quarterback right—all in one offseason,” he said.


The Need for Patience and Development

Rizzo emphasized the importance of context. Sanders’ five-game experience is a small sample size in an environment designed to hinder growth. “Development takes time. Patience is required. Building around a young quarterback with the right infrastructure matters more than raw talent,” he argued. Cleveland’s failure isn’t about drafting talent; it’s about failing to create conditions for success.

Rizzo warned that history shows the Browns will likely continue the cycle: blame the quarterback, draft someone new, keep the same dysfunctional system, and wonder why nothing changes.


A Systemic Problem

“Shadour Sanders was set up to fail. Just like Dylan Gabriel, just like Joe Flacco,” Rizzo said. The problem in Cleveland is organizational, not personal. Without leadership changes and competent coaching, even the most talented quarterback is doomed to struggle.

Rizzo’s analysis extends beyond finger-pointing. He recognizes effort and heart in the current roster, even with the disastrous offensive schemes. But motivation can only go so far; players need support, coaching, and systems designed for success.


Offseason Choices Could Make or Break the Franchise

As the season ends, Cleveland faces crucial decisions: fire Stefanski, overhaul the front office, give Sanders a real chance, or draft a new quarterback. History, Rizzo warns, suggests the easy route—blaming the quarterback—is the likely outcome.

“The clock is ticking,” Rizzo concluded. “The Browns have a choice to make. Let’s hope they make the right one. But if history is any guide, don’t hold your breath.”


Bottom Line

Tony Rizzo’s scathing critique paints a clear picture: Cleveland’s failures are systemic, not circumstantial. Rookie quarterbacks like Shedeur Sanders are not failing due to lack of talent, but because of decades of organizational dysfunction, poor coaching, and a culture that prioritizes avoiding mistakes over fostering growth. Unless the Browns make sweeping changes in leadership and infrastructure, the cycle of disappointment will continue, leaving fans to endure yet another season of frustration.

Related Posts

Our Privacy policy

https://autulu.com - © 2026 News - Website owner by LE TIEN SON