Caitlyn Clark SLAMS THE WNBA For Choosing Brittany Griner Over Her| Exposes WNBA Corruption
Caitlin Clark vs. The WNBA: Rising Star Challenges League’s Image Politics and Power Plays
In a league desperate for mainstream relevance, is the WNBA sidelining its most bankable star? Caitlin Clark’s meteoric rise has sparked more than just record-breaking attendance — it’s ignited a conversation about favoritism, league politics, and a culture war simmering under the surface.
Since being drafted by the Indiana Fever in 2024, Caitlin Clark has been nothing short of a phenomenon. She’s packed arenas, driven up TV ratings, boosted merchandise sales, and inspired a generation of new fans—many of whom had never tuned into a WNBA game until she arrived. Despite her popularity and performance, however, Clark has faced what many now believe is a calculated effort by the WNBA to keep her out of the spotlight.
While Clark is selling out games and putting up historic numbers, the league seems to be funneling its attention elsewhere—most notably, toward veteran Brittney Griner. From promo packages and ESPN features to media day spotlights, the league’s focus on Griner’s comeback story has drawn increasing scrutiny. Some fans and analysts argue that Griner’s profile has been elevated at the expense of Clark’s, a rookie who, by all metrics, has reignited interest in women’s basketball.
Clark herself has largely avoided controversy, refusing to name names or engage in drama. But recent interviews suggest her patience is wearing thin. After a game marred by yet another questionable no-call foul, Clark paused in a press conference and acknowledged her “frustration.” It was a rare break from her usual diplomatic tone—one that many fans took as confirmation that she, too, sees the favoritism and media manipulation at play.
The situation came to a head when Clark was snubbed from the WNBA All-Star Game’s starting lineup, a move that shocked fans and analysts alike given her impact. In contrast, Griner—who missed most of last season and hasn’t matched Clark’s influence this year—was handed a prominent role in league promotions. ESPN even skipped a prime-time sit-down interview with Clark following the draft, a moment that would have been a golden PR opportunity.
Critics of the league allege that this isn’t just bad marketing—it’s intentional image control. The WNBA, they argue, has a preferred narrative: players who align with certain political, cultural, or identity-based ideals are elevated, while others—like Clark, who is straight, media-polished, and doesn’t lean into the league’s dominant progressive messaging—are subtly sidelined.
The disparity in treatment isn’t limited to media coverage. On the court, Clark has taken a physical beating. Opposing players have been seen fouling her hard, and in some cases, blindsiding her with hits that don’t get called. Notably, guard Kennedy Carter blindsided Clark in a game that triggered outrage—but received no immediate penalty. Meanwhile, Griner enjoys the league’s protection and spotlight, continuing her media tour long after her return from Russian detainment.
This dichotomy—Clark being shoved midcourt without calls while Griner is hailed as a league savior—has sparked a firestorm online. Fans have flooded social media with commentary pointing out that Clark is being punished for being the “wrong type of star.” As one viral comment put it: “I thought I was self-destructive until I found out about the WNBA.”
Even ESPN’s mid-season player rankings demoted Clark from the top four to number nine, despite her being the most talked-about player in the league. The justification? A vague nod to “veteran presence” and “defensive ability.” But fans and analysts weren’t buying it, especially given the objective data showing Clark’s overwhelming impact on attendance, merchandise sales, and viewership.
And the numbers don’t lie. Clark helped drive 18.9 million viewers to the 2024 NCAA championship game—the most-watched women’s basketball event ever. She’s been credited with record-breaking ticket sales for the Indiana Fever. And yet, the league continues to prop up others who aren’t delivering the same tangible returns.
So what’s really going on?
Many point to identity politics. The WNBA has long embraced and promoted LGBTQ+ representation, which has rightfully been a part of its culture. However, critics argue that the league now prioritizes ideological alignment over performance and popularity. Clark, who is in a public relationship with her boyfriend Connor McCaffrey, openly speaks about her personal life in a way that subtly contrasts with the league’s more dominant identity narratives.
Former player Candice Wiggins voiced similar concerns in 2017, saying she was bullied for not fitting in culturally and for being straight. At the time, her comments were met with criticism from some players and media—but her claims have since taken on new relevance amid the Caitlin Clark controversy.
To be clear, this isn’t about tearing other players down. Griner’s time in Russia, her wrongful detainment, and her return are undeniably compelling. Angel Reese’s brash confidence and viral moments have brought eyes to the league as well. But the question remains: why can’t the WNBA celebrate all of its stars, including the one who’s arguably done the most to grow its audience?
Instead, the league appears to be operating from a playbook that favors control over merit, narrative over numbers, and familiar faces over fresh ones.
If the WNBA truly wants to capitalize on its moment in the spotlight, it may need to re-evaluate what kind of stars it supports—and why.
Because right now, it looks like they’re willing to fumble the future to protect the past.
What do you think? Is Caitlin Clark being targeted—or is the WNBA just struggling to balance old loyalties with a new era of stardom?
Play video:
