Candace Owens EXPOSES Erika Kirk for LYING and Blackmailing After Charlie Kirk’s Passing!
What Candace Owens Is Saying (“Exposes”)
Cover-up & Lack of Truth-Seeking
Owens argues that the official story around Charlie Kirk’s assassination doesn’t add up. She’s questioning whether Tyler Robinson (the accused shooter) is the full or only explanation. The Economic Times+2International Business Times UK+2
She implies that Erika Kirk (Charlie’s widow) may be actively discouraging deeper investigations:
“What kind of a widow would not want the truths of her husband’s murder to come out?” The Economic Times
Suspicion About Private Journals / Diary
According to Owens, she has had access to Charlie Kirk’s private journals. In these, allegedly, Kirk wrote things like: “I no longer felt safe in my own home … I still love her, but I don’t know if she’ll be there for me.” Owens frames that as evidence he feared someone “very close” — possibly Erika. X (formerly Twitter)
Financial & Power Motives
Owens suggests that after Charlie’s death, Erika quickly took over leadership at Turning Point USA (TPUSA), and Owens questions whether this transition was purely genuine grief or if there are other motives. X (formerly Twitter)
There’s an insinuation that money, control, and “marketing” of Charlie’s legacy may be part of Erika’s post-death strategy. Owens states that Erika “skipped straight to acceptance” and is “using your grief for marketing.” X (formerly Twitter)
Alleged Foreknowledge or Complicity
Owens has floated the idea that Erika might have had foreknowledge of Charlie’s death or was otherwise complicit in a “cover-up.” X (formerly Twitter)
She also points to what she sees as suspicious behavior from Erika shortly after Charlie’s death — for instance, public appearances, interviews, merch, etc. X (formerly Twitter)+1
Blackmail / External Pressure
Owens ties the narrative to pressure on Charlie from pro-Israel donors. She claims Charlie was being “bullied” by “Jewish donors” to change his political behavior. The Economic Times
She alleges there was financial blackmail related to Charlie’s Israel stance. International Business Times UK
Personal Betrayal
Owens also implies betrayal on a more personal level: that Charlie may not have trusted those closest to him (including Erika). She frames some of her claims around emotional and relational “betrayal.” X (formerly Twitter)
Responses & Pushback
Erika Kirk’s Defense: Erika has publicly called for “grace” and cautioned against conspiracy-mongering in the wake of her husband’s death. Hindustan Times
Ben Shapiro: He claimed Owens accused Erika of murdering Charlie, but Owens strongly denied that:
“That is beyond smearing. He tried to pressure Megyn Kelly … by lying … and EXPLICITLY stating that I accused Erika Kirk of killing her husband … He is completely deranged.” AOL+28pmnews.com+2
Public Criticism: Some conservative figures (like Laura Loomer) have blasted Owens’ allegations about Erika as “sick” and dangerously conspiratorial. Hindustan Times
Social Media / Reddit: There are a lot of online discussions. Some users support Owens’ theory, saying Erika’s behavior post-death is “off.” Others argue that Owens hasn’t produced definitive proof of her more serious claims. Reddit+2Reddit+2
My Assessment
Strengths of Owens’ Case:
She is raising legitimate questions about the investigation and narrative around Charlie’s death.
She provides some evidence: personal text / diary excerpts, claims of leaked documents, and a pattern of behavior she finds suspicious.
Her story resonates with people who already distrust political organizations and elite donors.
Weaknesses / Risks:
As of now, many of her claims are not independently verified in public reporting.
Some of the more serious implications (foreknowledge, blackmail, complicity) are based on inference and insider claims — not concrete legal proof (at least publicly).
Her narrative risks fueling conspiracies, especially about sensitive topics (e.g., Israel, donors).
Bottom Line
Yes, Candace Owens is making sweeping and serious accusations against Erika Kirk — suggesting betrayal, potential financial motives, and a cover-up in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s death.
But not all of her claims are proven, and there’s significant pushback — even from conservative voices.
Right now, her “exposure” is more about raising questions than presenting a fully substantiated alternative narrative.
