Candace Parker FINALLY EXPOSES Angel Reese As A FRAUD – She’ll NEVER Be Caitlin Clark!

Candace Parker Finally Exposes Angel Reese As a Fraud: She’ll Never Be Caitlin Clark

It started with a single, blunt ranking. Candace Parker, the legendary seven-time WNBA All-Star and two-time MVP, was live, doing a tier list of active WNBA players. She went down the tiers—S, A, B—and then, without hesitation, she placed Angel Reese at a solid C.

Fans of Angel Reese, the self-proclaimed “Double Double Barbie,” instantly erupted in outrage. On social media and comment sections everywhere, the backlash was swift and brutal. How could Parker—one of the game’s greatest minds—rank Reese so low, beneath players the internet considered less accomplished? Was Parker jealous? Hating? Dismissing one of the league’s brightest young stars?

Candace Parker didn’t flinch. She doubled down.

Her reasoning was straightforward—and damning. She acknowledged Reese’s relentless effort on the offensive glass, but that’s where the praise ended. “To be above, to be A-tier or B-tier,” Candace explained, “you have to be able to carry a team. You need to be the first or second option, not just a role player. Angel Reese isn’t there yet.”

She went on, drawing a line between being productive and being transformative. While Reese was putting up impressive stats—double-doubles almost nightly—her contributions weren’t translating into wins. “All these double-doubles,” Parker said, “mean nothing if they don’t lead to victories.” She called Reese’s stat lines “empty calories,” suggesting that dominating the box score is meaningless when your team is losing most nights.

The fallout was immediate. Reese’s supporters filled feeds with anger, memes, and complaints about Parker’s judgment. But rather than walk it back, Candace Parker appeared on podcasts and interviews, clarifying: “There’s no hate toward Angel Reese. I love her game. But I can’t rank someone higher just because of rebounds. Leadership, impact, and team success matter.”

To underscore her standard, Parker placed elite talents like A’ja Wilson, Nafisa Collier, and Breanna Stewart in the S tier. Caitlin Clark—the rookie sensation who has already completely reshaped Indiana’s offense—she slotted as A-tier with room to grow. Reese, for now, was grouped lower, with unproven players and recent injury returnees.

The data backs up Parker’s harsh assessment. This season, Reese’s Chicago Sky have struggled, and the team actually performs better in the win column when Reese logs fewer minutes. When Reese plays less, other teammates step up, turnovers drop, the offense runs smoother, and wins come easier. In contrast, games where Reese racks up double-doubles often end in blowouts the wrong way. In a recent rout by the Minnesota Lynx, Reese turned the ball over nine times and posted a disastrous minus-19 plus/minus. It was, as analysts said, “the moment that peeled back the curtain” and revealed just how little her stats were helping her team win.

Opposing coaches have now caught on, targeting Reese with pressure defenses and daring her to make plays under duress. The result has been a string of unforced errors—bad passes, travels, and lost possessions. “Chicago’s coaches,” one analyst pointed out, “keep trying to polish the stat line while ignoring the turnovers that are sinking the team.”

For Parker, and a growing number of basketball insiders, the illusion is clear: Reese has been hyped as a budding superstar, but her game is still that of a role player. “She’s like a Draymond Green,” said Parker, “advertised as a franchise player when she’s really a supporting piece. Marketing and self-promotion have polished the brand, but the reality isn’t matching the hype.”

Meanwhile, Caitlin Clark continues to show what real impact looks like. She doesn’t just fill the stat sheet—she elevates everyone around her, reshaping offenses and putting Indiana on the map as a real contender for the future. Clark’s presence has powered TV ratings and All-Star buzz, even when she hasn’t played.

For the Sky, questions are mounting: Can a team built around Reese ever make a true playoff run? Or is Chicago’s stubborn reliance on empty stats holding everyone back?

Candace Parker’s critique pulled back the curtain on the whole show. It exposed how superficial stat-chasing has replaced substance, and how fans are often lured in by highlight reels rather than actual championship-caliber basketball. “You can’t fake leadership,” she said. “You can’t fake championship impact.”

As fans and analysts grow more sophisticated, the difference between hype and heart, empty numbers and real wins, is clearer than ever. The WNBA’s future belongs to players who deliver in pressure moments and make their teammates better. For now, Parker’s warning rings true: “Let’s stop pretending these double-doubles are history. They’re just nice numbers, until they help you win.”

And until Angel Reese’s contributions start translating into wins—not just for herself, but for her team—she’ll remain in the “C” tier of Candace Parker’s world. It’s a wake-up call the league can’t ignore, and finally, the truth is out.

Play video: