Operation Broken Promise: When a Safety Net Became a Pipeline
The Morning the Midwest Woke Up
MINNEAPOLIS — The safety net is supposed to catch people on their worst day. On April 15, 2025, federal agents said they discovered it had been repurposed into something else entirely: a conveyor belt for cash, corruption and fentanyl.
.
.
.
By sunrise, the FBI and DEA had executed 67 coordinated raids across Minneapolis and Washington, D.C., targeting what officials described as a sprawling scheme that fused grant fraud with narcotics trafficking. At the center was Dr. Ahmed Bashir Muhammad, 52, the public face of a federally funded refugee business program that had received $480 million over nine years.
The first headlines were the kind that land like a punch: more than 1 million lethal doses of fentanyl seized, $89 million in cash recovered and 14 federal officials allegedly implicated in a bribery network that investigators say reached into Congress.
For years, Muhammad was introduced as proof of concept — a refugee who made it, a PhD economist who “gave back,” a polished leader whose résumé opened doors and quieted doubts. Now, prosecutors say the same credibility was the camouflage.
The Man Everyone Wanted to Believe In
Muhammad arrived in Minnesota as a refugee in 2001, according to investigators. By 2017, he had become a celebrated figure in immigrant entrepreneurship circles: a PhD in economics from the University of Minnesota; a former World Bank consultant; an adviser to governors on refugee policy; a witness before a Senate immigration committee; and a winner of a prominent small-business award.
In 2017, he founded the Minnesota Refugee Economic Development Agency (MREDA), described as a public-private partnership designed to help refugees build small businesses through microloans, training and mentorship. The pitch was simple and appealing: families fleeing war and persecution would receive support to open grocery stores, restaurants, repair shops and service businesses — stepping stones to self-sufficiency.
Federal funding followed. Investigators say MREDA drew from multiple streams, including Small Business Administration programs and refugee-related grants tied to Health and Human Services and the State Department, among others. The organization claimed to have helped 3,400 families start 2,100 businesses across Minnesota, Wisconsin and the Dakotas.
Muhammad became a staple in success-story coverage. Politicians praised him. Invitations arrived. The narrative wrote itself — until an accountant started calling businesses on a list.
The Phone Calls That Didn’t Add Up
On April 8, 2025, a routine audit became a live wire. An SBA Office of Inspector General accountant, Sarah Chen, began verifying MREDA’s loan portfolio the way auditors do: paper first, then people.
She called a grocery store in South Minneapolis listed as having received a $45,000 loan in 2022. The store existed. The owner’s answer didn’t.
The store said it never received the loan, never worked with MREDA and opened using family money. Chen called another business. Same outcome. Another. Same.
By the end of the day, Chen had contacted 47 businesses. Only 12 confirmed receiving funds. The others either never got money, never applied, had been rejected — or didn’t exist in any meaningful sense beyond a file.
In a small sample, she estimated phantom lending worth roughly $1.33 million. She escalated the findings late that night. Within hours, federal investigators were reviewing the full nine-year portfolio.
The Audit’s Verdict: Phantom Businesses, Real Money
What agents and auditors say they found was not a handful of bad files. They described it as a system.
Of the 2,100 businesses MREDA claimed to have funded, investigators concluded that only 847 actually received loans. The remaining 1,253 were described as phantom entries — fake businesses, rejected applicants presented as funded, or identity-theft victims whose information was used to create paperwork that looked legitimate.
The money trail was worse. Investigators allege MREDA received $480 million in federal funding and distributed $127 million in legitimate loans, leaving $353 million diverted.
According to investigators, the diversion moved through offshore accounts, cash withdrawals, shell companies and luxury purchases. But one item transformed the case from a fraud scandal into a national-security alarm: federal agents say they linked $127 million in wire transfers from offshore accounts tied to Muhammad to known drug-trafficking organizations.
In other words, prosecutors allege the refugee-development apparatus wasn’t just being looted — it was being used.
“Complicit”: The Allegations Inside the Government
This is where the case becomes something else.
Investigators say evidence suggests 14 federal officials knowingly approved continued funding despite repeated red flags and accepted bribes to obstruct oversight. The alleged bribery total is $67 million over nine years.
Among those named by investigators were a congressman on the House Appropriations Committee, a senator connected to small-business oversight and senior administrators inside agencies responsible for grants and refugee services. Agents say bribes were not merely payments for silence but tools used to block audits, bury complaints and keep the money moving.
In briefings described by officials, the language shifted from “fraud” to “systemic corruption.” Not a blind spot, but a blindfold.
The Fentanyl Thread That Began at a Port
The narcotics side of the story did not begin in Minnesota, investigators say. They trace it back 19 months earlier to the Port of Los Angeles.
On June 14, 2024, Customs and Border Protection officers inspected a container arriving from Kenya. The manifest listed textiles and spices. An X-ray suggested something denser than cumin.
Inside a spice bag, officers found 47 kilograms of fentanyl powder, vacuum-sealed. The shipment’s destination was a Minneapolis import-export business called Basher Global Imports.
The owner, Hassan Bashier, presented documentation that investigators say appeared clean. Authorities said the case initially cooled because they could not prove knowledge. But a DEA agent continued tracking shipments, and three subsequent inspections allegedly found more fentanyl. Authorities said the total seized in those inspections was 89 kilograms.
A warrant led to a deeper forensic review of devices and records, and investigators say they uncovered a financial picture that did not match the storefront story. They allege Bashier’s company generated $340 million over seven years — far exceeding what a small import-export business should reasonably produce.
The money, prosecutors say, also did not sit still. It flowed outward through offshore corridors, cash deposits structured under reporting thresholds and transfers to family-linked entities.
A Family Enterprise, According to Investigators
Federal authorities allege the operation ran like an assembly line.
Investigators say fentanyl was hidden inside legitimate imports, transported to Minneapolis and processed in a warehouse listed as storage for restaurant supplies. The powder was allegedly pressed into counterfeit pills designed to resemble Xanax, Percocet and Adderall.
Packaging, agents say, occurred after hours in restaurant kitchens tied to the network. Distribution allegedly used community institutions as cover, with sales spreading across 14 states through personal relationships and connections.
Money laundering, investigators allege, completed the circle: cash proceeds were made to look like import payments, investments or charitable donations.
Investigators also said they came to believe Kenya was a misdirection — that fentanyl supply lines were connected to Mexican cartels and trans-shipped to reduce scrutiny.
At that point, agents say, the case stopped looking like one family’s scheme and started looking like a wider network.
April 15: Raids, Warehouses and Cash Walls
By 4:47 a.m. in Minnesota, agents were in position, authorities said.
Investigators say Muhammad was arrested at his lakefront home as he attempted to burn documents. Inside the residence, agents reportedly found $23.7 million in cash hidden in walls, safes and storage areas, along with records they claim documented phantom loans, bribe payments, cartel-linked transfers and encrypted communications.
At MREDA headquarters, investigators say they recovered $8.9 million in cash from filing cabinets and seized systems that allegedly mapped the fraud, including records of loans, identities and payments.
Three industrial warehouses listed publicly as community business sites were described by agents as narcotics facilities. In one, authorities say they found fentanyl powder, pill presses and $14.7 million in cash. In another, nearly 890,000 pills allegedly ready for distribution. In a third, fentanyl powder, money-counting machines and $19.2 million in cash.
By mid-morning, officials said the numbers were staggering: 67 arrests in total, including Muhammad, 14 federal officials, MREDA staff and associates and alleged distributors and cartel affiliates. Authorities said they seized more than 1 million lethal doses of fentanyl and recovered $89 million in cash.
The Human Toll Behind the Numbers
Fentanyl’s story is measured in loss as much as seizures and indictments.
Investigators say fentanyl tied to the alleged operation was linked to at least 340 overdose deaths across Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa and the Dakotas between 2020 and 2025. They estimated the broader fatalities connected to the network could be higher, though such figures are typically contested and depend on the strength of tracing and attribution.
Prosecutors have highlighted victim stories in public statements, including young adults who believed they were taking prescription medication and a teenager who died after taking a pill at a party.
In the government’s framing, the cruelty of the case was not only the presence of fentanyl, but the alleged funding mechanism behind it: public grants intended to lift vulnerable families.
Refugees Caught in the Blast Radius
Authorities also acknowledged that the collapse of MREDA harmed people who did nothing wrong.
Investigators say 847 refugee families did receive legitimate loans. Many built real businesses and relied on the program’s stability. When the organization was shut down, borrowers faced scrutiny and uncertainty, and some feared reputational damage simply by association.
Meanwhile, investigators allege 1,253 individuals had their identities used to create phantom loans. Instead of receiving support, they became names on fraudulent paperwork and, in some cases, were initially treated as suspicious until investigators concluded they were victims.
For immigrant communities already navigating bureaucracy and mistrust, the case created another layer of fear and disruption.
Courtroom Reckoning and Sentencing
Federal prosecutors brought a broad case backed, authorities said, by financial records, seized cash, digital communications and cooperating witnesses.
After a trial described by officials as lasting several weeks, Muhammad was convicted on all counts presented, and multiple public officials received significant prison terms. Authorities characterized the sentences as among the most severe in a modern public-corruption case.
Prosecutors argued the scale and intent set the case apart: it was not a paperwork error, they said, but an alleged betrayal of public trust that enabled widespread harm.
Fallout: Frozen Programs, New Rules, Old Questions
The impact extended beyond arrests and courtrooms.
Officials said some federal refugee and small-business programs were suspended for months while audits expanded, temporarily freezing funding for legitimate organizations and limiting access to loans for real entrepreneurs. The shutdowns, authorities argued, reflected how deeply the oversight system had been compromised.
In response, lawmakers passed a grant-accountability package emphasizing real-time monitoring, quarterly site visits, beneficiary verification, stronger whistleblower protections and harsher penalties for officials who accept bribes or suppress fraud reporting.
Even with reforms, the central question remains: how a program designed to help vulnerable people could allegedly be turned into a financial engine for organized crime — and what it will take to restore trust without punishing the innocent.
