🚨 Identity of Secret Co-Conspirators in the Epstein Files Blown Wide Open

As the Epstein files continue to be released, one question dominates public attention: who are the co-conspirators?

Much of the discussion has focused on 10 alleged co-conspirators referenced in a July 7, 2019 FBI email that surfaced in the latest document dump. However, mounting evidence suggests the number is far higher.

Former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg, speaking on the Midas Touch Network, argues that the scope of alleged co-conspirators extends well beyond ten — potentially as many as 25 individuals.

Why Only Three Names Were Unredacted

In the FBI email, while many names remain redacted, three were revealed:

Ghislaine Maxwell

Jean-Luc Brunel, a French modeling agent who later died in prison

Leslie Wexner, founder of L Brands and longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein

Maxwell’s inclusion is unsurprising, given her conviction for sex trafficking-related crimes alongside Epstein. Brunel’s name was likely unredacted because he is deceased. But Wexner’s inclusion raises questions: if he was unredacted, why not the others?

Political Selectivity?

Aronberg questions why individuals who have never been charged remain protected, while Bill Clinton’s name and image appear repeatedly throughout the document releases.

One explanation, he suggests, is political motivation — an attempt to target political opponents while diverting attention from others. Aronberg argues this selective disclosure undermines public trust and raises serious concerns about fairness and intent.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Habeas Petition

The most striking development comes from Ghislaine Maxwell herself.

In a recently filed habeas corpus petition, Maxwell claims she was the victim of selective prosecution. She argues that while she was charged and sentenced to 20 years in prison, dozens of others were never indicted.

According to her filing:

At least 25 men entered into secret settlements with Epstein’s victims

These individuals, she claims, should be considered co-conspirators

None of them were criminally charged

Maxwell also references the infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, which granted Epstein — and his named and unnamed co-conspirators — immunity. She points out that four co-conspirators were explicitly named in that agreement, yet none were ever prosecuted.

Will Her Argument Succeed?

Aronberg makes clear that Maxwell’s legal strategy is unlikely to succeed. The evidence against her was substantial, and courts have already rejected her appeals. Her habeas petition was filed pro se (without lawyers), likely due to financial constraints.

Still, Aronberg emphasizes that her claims are revealing, not because they will free her, but because they highlight how many others may have avoided accountability.

The Bigger Question

The failure to indict co-conspirators did not begin with any single administration. It spans multiple presidencies, raising a troubling question:

Why has only one person — Ghislaine Maxwell — been held criminally responsible for Epstein’s network?

That question remains unanswered.