Caitlin Clark has taken the basketball world by storm, scoring or assisting on a staggering 71% of the Indiana Fever’s points. Her phenomenal performance has shattered records and drawn television ratings that surpass some NBA games. Despite these remarkable achievements, Clark has faced significant oversight and exclusion, raising questions about decision-making within women’s basketball.

Caitlin Clark’s impact on the court is undeniable. As a rookie, she has consistently set new benchmarks, scoring or assisting on 71% of her team’s points, the highest ever in league history. Her presence has not only elevated her team’s performance but also driven TV ratings higher than some high-profile NBA games, demonstrating her broad appeal and star power.

Caitlin Clark's next big move could be helping Indiana Fever end seven-year  WNBA playoff drought | WETM - MyTwinTiers.com

Despite her extraordinary contributions, Clark was notably excluded from the Olympic team and the WNBA All-Star skills competitions. This decision has sparked controversy and criticism, with many arguing that her talents and influence are being undervalued. The missed opportunities to showcase her skills on larger stages reflect possible gatekeeping and insular attitudes within the sport’s administration.

The rivalry between Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese is being compared to the legendary Magic Johnson and Larry Bird face-offs, adding a layer of excitement and engagement to women’s basketball. This competitive dynamic has the potential to draw even more viewers and fans to the sport, further emphasizing the importance of leveraging such star power effectively.

Give us a reason to watch," Caitlin Clark's snub from Olympics squad  SLAMMED by Colin Cowherd – FirstSportz

Sports commentator Colin Cowherd has voiced strong criticism against the decision-makers in women’s basketball for failing to capitalize on Clark’s growing popularity. He argues that including Clark in major events like the Olympic team would not only boost viewership but also enhance financial opportunities for the sport. Cowherd highlights that major sports stars have historically elevated their sports, and Clark has the potential to do the same for women’s basketball.

The exclusion of Caitlin Clark from the Olympic team and other significant competitions is seen as a major oversight. Cowherd urges for her inclusion in future events to fully harness her star potential, drive viewership, and promote women’s basketball. He emphasizes that missing this opportunity again would be a critical mistake, one that the sport can ill afford.

In summary, Caitlin Clark is a rising star whose talents and influence have been underestimated by the current system. Her record-breaking performances and ability to draw large audiences make her an invaluable asset to women’s basketball. It is imperative for the sport’s decision-makers to recognize and utilize her potential to elevate the game to new heights.