Three Shadows: A Chronicle of Sasquatch Evidence

For decades, the forests of North America have whispered of giants. Shadows moving between trees, figures rising from brush, sounds of wood breaking in the night. Skeptics dismiss them as hoaxes, blurry illusions, or misidentified animals. Yet some footage refuses to die.
Three clips, captured in different places and times, continue to haunt researchers. Each shows something massive, upright, and inexplicable. Together, they weave a story that points not to costumes or coincidence, but to a hidden reality.
Part I: The Provo Canyon Encounter
The Setting
It was late October 2012 in Utah’s Provo Canyon. A group of campers, laughing and filming casually, noticed a dark figure crouched in the brush. At first, they thought it was a bear.
Then it stood up.
The Shock
The figure rose with long arms and a compact head set directly on its shoulders. The campers’ reaction was immediate—panic, retreat, voices cracking with fear. Authentic terror, unscripted and raw.
The video went viral, millions of views within days. Local news reported it, national outlets followed. Debate erupted.
The Details
Frame by frame, the footage reveals a left arm swinging into view, positioned unlike any bear’s foreleg. The head is hunched, facing the campers, ominous. No neck, just shoulders and skull, as countless Sasquatch witnesses have described.
Provo Canyon itself has a reputation. Stories of sightings stretch back decades. This was not the first shadow to rise from its brush.
The Analysis
Utah video specialist Mitch Phillips studied the clip. He found visible muscle structure, natural fur, authentic movement. No signs of manipulation. His conclusion: “It’s real. This is a huge piece of evidence supporting the existence of Bigfoot.”
Skeptics called it a blob-squatch, too blurry to matter. Yet even Phil Poling of Parabreakdown, a well-known critic, admitted it was one of the few clips likely authentic.
The Mystery
The campers fled, leaving behind only their footage. No coordinates, no follow-up investigation. Yet thousands scrutinized the clip, and no fakery was uncovered.
The Provo Canyon footage remains a haunting glimpse of something massive rising from the earth, startling humans into flight.

Part II: The Skunk Ape of Mississippi
The Hunter
October 24, 2013. Near Tunica, Mississippi, hog hunter Josh Highcliffe heard strange noises behind a tree. He raised his camera.
What he filmed would become one of the most debated clips in modern Sasquatch history.
The Creature
A dark figure crouched, tearing at a stump. For a full minute, Josh filmed as it gripped wood, pried it apart, tossed debris aside with two-handed strength. Then it rose, nearly doubling in size.
Fear overwhelmed him. He dropped the camera and fled.
The Evidence
The creature’s interaction with its environment is striking. It grips, levers, and tosses wood with purpose. Audible snaps and tears echo—real timber breaking, not foam props.
Its proportions are unusual: long forearms, broad torso, fluid rise from crouch. Not the awkward struggle of a human in a costume.
Josh’s description was detailed: date, time, location, even notes about his iPhone mishap. Specificity that fits eyewitness field notes, not hoax captions.
The Skeptics
Critics proposed three explanations:
Human in a suit. Yet the purposeful two-handed movements and fluid rise defy costume limitations.
Black bear. Bears rip stumps with forelegs and mouth, not bipeal stance and two-handed levering.
Escaped gorilla. But Mississippi has no captive gorillas. The nearest are in Memphis, none escaped.
Each theory collapses under scrutiny.
The Weight of Evidence
The clip’s specificity, environmental interaction, and lack of plausible mundane explanation make it uniquely difficult to dismiss.
Either it is a perfectly executed hoax defying all patterns, or it is genuine.
The balance tips toward the latter.
Part III: The Birch Bay Trail Cam
The Capture
April 28, 2021. Birch Bay, Washington. A motion-triggered trail camera on a homestead recorded a massive figure striding past.
The uploader, Jimmy B, ran a small channel documenting local wildlife—coyotes, raccoons, owls. No history of hoaxes.
The Figure
The subject is enormous. Comparing its height to birch trees, analysts estimate eight feet. Its stride is fluid, forward-leaning, continuous.
Branches shift subtly as it passes, interacting with its environment. Not a digital overlay, but a physical presence.
The Provenance
The Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization archived the clip, geotagging it to Birch Bay and publishing a size analysis. Chain of custody established.
The Skeptics
Critics argued:
Man in a shirt. Yet Jimmy B’s channel shows only incidental wildlife captures, not staged skits.
Scaling uncertainty. Height estimates can err, but stride length and speed remain compelling.
Infrared limitations. Night cameras smear edges, but cannot fabricate fluid, powerful motion.
The rebuttals hold. The figure’s stride, posture, and environmental interaction remain organic.
The Corroboration
The forward lean, the 90° leg angles, the continuous stride—these mirror the Patterson–Gimlin film. Two captures, decades apart, geographically distant, yet consistent in morphology.
The Birch Bay footage is not isolated. It is part of a pattern.

Part IV: The Pattern of Shadows
Three clips. Three places. Three times.
Provo Canyon: a figure rising from brush, startling campers into panic.
Mississippi: a creature tearing wood, rising to towering height.
Birch Bay: a massive figure striding past a trail cam, fluid and powerful.
Each shows something upright, massive, beyond human. Each defies mundane explanation.
Together, they form a mosaic of evidence.
Part V: The Skeptical Lens
Skeptics argue blur, lack of context, costumes, misidentifications. Yet each clip resists dismissal.
Authentic witness reactions in Provo Canyon.
Environmental interaction in Mississippi.
Chain of custody and corroboration in Birch Bay.
The odds of three independent hoaxes, each defying typical patterns, are slim.
Part VI: The Continuity of Giants
From Utah’s canyons to Mississippi’s swamps to Washington’s forests, the shadows are consistent. Broad shoulders, long arms, fluid strides, compact heads.
They sway, rise, tear, stride. Behaviors echoing great apes, not bears.
The continuity across geography and decades suggests not isolated hoaxes, but a hidden species.
Epilogue: Into the Woods
The forests remain silent, yet alive. Cameras capture fleeting glimpses. Witnesses flee in terror. Analysts debate endlessly.
But the figures endure. Rising from brush, tearing wood, striding past cameras.
Three shadows, three stories, one mystery.
Not costumes. Not coincidence. Something else.
Something that waits, deep in the forests, for the next witness to stumble upon it.