It was a chilly February afternoon on the boardwalk when John Speckman took his girlfriend’s two small dogs—one a tiny, white Maltese—out for their daily stroll. For anyone who has ever owned a Maltese, you know the deal: they weigh five pounds but truly believe they are apex predators. Judge Judy calls them “yappers,” and as it turns out, that yap has a very high price tag.
The Incident: Yaps vs. Lunges
John was heading home, leashes in hand, when he passed a neighbor’s stoop. Waiting there was Ms. Wallace son’s girlfriend, holding a much larger dog on a tight lead.
According to John, his two little dogs were doing what they do best: barking and yapping at the bigger dog as they passed. Then, in a split second, the big dog lunged. There was a scuffle, a yelp, and Jojo the Maltese ended up with a wound that resulted in over $3,000 in vet bills.
John’s argument was simple: “My dogs were leashed. Her dog bit mine. She should pay.”
The Legal Reality Check
Ms. Wallace’s defense was equally firm. She claimed she had tucked her dog tightly to her side and even warned John that her dog wasn’t friendly. She waited for him to pass, but the “yappers” kept coming, lunging and barking until the inevitable happened.
This is where Judge Judy stepped in with a dose of “Grandmotherly Wisdom” mixed with judicial steel.
“I believe everything you told me,” Judy told John, a statement that usually makes a plaintiff smile—until the “but” comes.
“Pick ‘Em Up!”
Judge Judy’s ruling turned on one major point: The Duty of Care. If you are walking two tiny dogs that you know are aggressive barkers, and you see a large dog ahead, you have a responsibility to keep your “lion-hearted” pets safe. In the eyes of the court, Ms. Wallace was doing exactly what she was supposed to do: her dog was leashed, under her control, and on her own property.
“If your dogs are doing the yappy, you pick ’em up,” Judy declared. “You hold them and you move on. Not every dog is going to be friendly.”
The Verdict: A $3,000 Lesson
John was stunned. He had photos, he had vet bills, and he had a bitten dog. But Judge Judy was unmoved. She explained that a dog owner is not an “absolute insurer” of safety. If your small dog provokes a larger dog by yapping and lunging in its face, and the larger dog is leashed and controlled, the owner of the larger dog isn’t liable for the reaction.
John tried to argue, shaking his head in disbelief, but Judy’s final word was ice cold: “You don’t have to show me any evidence. I believe you… and you still have no case. Pick them up and keep them safe. Goodbye!”
The Takeaway: Just because your dog is small doesn’t mean it has a “get out of jail free” card to provoke others. If you see a potential conflict, don’t rely on a leash—rely on your arms.
Do you think the owner of the biting dog should always be responsible, or do you agree with Judge Judy that the “yappers” brought it on themselves? 👇 Sound off in the comments!
