In the courtroom of Judge Milian , the air was thick with irony. Mark Green was suing Rita Alde for $1,000—a fee he claimed was promised to him for acting as a witness in her personal injury lawsuit. On the surface, it sounded like a simple contract dispute, but as the details emerged, it became a story of “shady” bargains and a very awkward living situation.
The Trench and the Trip
The story began in 2009. Mark was working for Rita, a general contractor, digging a trench at a job site. One evening, in the dark, Rita tripped on an uneven sidewalk and suffered a devastating injury: a broken femur that required surgery and a metal rod in her leg.
Mark was the only witness. Rita sued the homeowner, but she had a problem: Mark didn’t want to get involved. He didn’t want the “hassle” of court dates or depositions. He certainly didn’t care about his “civic duty.”
The “Hooptie” Bargain
According to Mark, Rita knew she needed him to win. To ensure his cooperation, she allegedly made an offer: she would buy him a car from her sister.
“I wasn’t talking about no $10,000 car,” Mark told the court, “just even a hooptie… something was better than nothing.”
But when Mark saw the car, he noticed the engine was “smoking.” He declined the vehicle and made a counter-offer: “Give me $1,000.” Rita reportedly agreed, and for the next few years, Mark played the part of the faithful witness. He met with lawyers, gave statements, and attended depositions.
The $62,000 Surprise
Rita eventually settled her case. In court, she initially tried to play the role of a victimized citizen, claiming Mark helped her purely out of the goodness of his heart. She called him a “liar” and insisted she never promised a dime.
However, Judge Milian wasn’t buying the “warm and fuzzy” version of Mark Green. Looking at Mark, she remarked that he didn’t exactly strike her as the type of man who does anything for free. When the truth finally came out—that Rita had walked away with a $62,000 settlement—the judge’s mind was made up.
The Verdict and the Irony
Judge Milian pointed out the legal reality: while paying a witness to lie is a crime, paying for their “cooperation” or time is a gray area that must be disclosed. She concluded that Rita likely promised the money to avoid the cost and headache of subpoenaing an uncooperative witness.
The most bizarre twist? Mark and Rita live in the same building. In fact, Rita is Mark’s landlord. As they left the court—Mark with a $1,000 judgment and Rita with a bruised ego—the tension was palpable. Mark payed his rent week-to-week, and after suing his own landlord and winning, his “home sweet home” was about to get a lot more uncomfortable.
