💥 The Crypto Cartel: Attorney General Pam Bondi Panics, Refuses to Address Foreign Influence Buying Access to Trump

DOJ Chief Repeatedly Evades Questions on Foreign Nationals Attending Trump’s Memecoin Dinner and Massive UAE Stablecoin Purchase Tied to AI Chip Deals

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A routine Senate budget hearing transformed into a fiery confrontation over national security and corruption when Attorney General Pam Bondi completely collapsed under questioning about foreign interests allegedly buying influence with the President through his personal cryptocurrency ventures.

Bondi, who appeared before the Senate to discuss the DOJ budget, repeatedly refused to answer detailed allegations involving foreign nationals purchasing millions in presidential “memecoins” and a multi-billion-dollar stablecoin deal linked to restricted technology exports. Instead of addressing the ethical concerns, Bondi launched into a series of aggressive, politically charged attacks on the Senator’s home state and crime rates.

The Dinner and the Direct Quote

The confrontation was initiated by Senator Mkeley, who cut through the bureaucratic focus to ask a direct, highly sensitive question:

“Were there foreign interests attending that dinner?”—referring to a high-profile dinner hosted by the President for individuals who purchased large amounts of his personal memecoins.

Bondi immediately shut down, attempting to pivot the conversation entirely: “Senator, we’re here to talk about the Department of Justice and my budget for the upcoming year… I would think that you would want to talk about the leader of the Sinaloa cartel who was living in Oregon.”

.

.

.

However, Senator Mkeley cited explicit public evidence proving that the purpose of the crypto purchase was transactional influence:

Public Admission: Mkeley cited a specific buyer, Mr. Javelgos, the head of Freight Technology, Inc., who publicly stated: “I bought $2 million of these coins. I plan to buy $20 million because I want a favor from the president to change the policy guarding freight from Mexico to the United States.”

Mkeley argued that this solicitation of investments in the President’s personal product, leading to foreign attendees, demanded transparency.

Bondi’s emotional reaction was immediate and telling. She did not issue a denial; she attacked the premise, calling the question “wildly offensive,” accusing Mkeley of playing a “gotcha question,” and attacking the Senator’s home state over crime, entirely refusing to commit to appointing a special investigator.

The UAE AI Chip Scandal: A Clear Quid Pro Quo

The interrogation intensified when Mkeley presented a second, even more alarming scenario involving the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and a massive cryptocurrency purchase, directly linking foreign money to restricted national security technology:

Restricted Request: The UAE requested high-end AI chips that the U.S. had previously banned from export due to national security concerns.

The Crypto Transaction: The UAE’s National Security Adviser, also the CEO of MGX, subsequently announced that his company would buy $2 billion worth of the President’s stablecoin, USD1.

Policy Shift: Following this massive transaction, the President then visited the Middle East and signaled support, stating, “we will get you those AI chips.”

Mkeley asked Bondi directly: “Does that sequence of events concern you about foreign influence on the United States of America?”

Bondi again entirely refused to acknowledge the substance of the transaction, diverting the conversation back to drug traffickers in Oregon: “The foreign influence on America that I would be concerned about if I were you was the Mexican that we just the Mexican national that resided in Oregon…”

The Strategy of Diversion: A National Security Risk

As Senator Mkeley noted in his summary, Bondi’s refusal was absolute: “Let the record note that in terms of foreign influence and the sale of foreign influence through the president’s coins, she absolutely refuses to respond and instead turns to a whole list of different topics.”

This consistent and aggressive diversion reveals a critical pattern within the Justice Department under Bondi:

Defending Revenue Stream: The priority is not protecting the integrity of the presidency or U.S. policy, but protecting the President’s personal financial ventures and his revenue stream from public scrutiny.

Normalizing Corruption: By calling legitimate questions about foreign influence “wildly offensive,” Bondi attempts to normalize the transactional mixing of presidential authority and private profit. She treats the defense of the President’s business as a core responsibility of the Attorney General, rather than an ethical breach that demands investigation.

Weaponizing Local Crime: Bondi repeatedly weaponized local crime statistics and immigration issues (illegal aliens, cartels, fentanyl) to distract from the high-level national security threat of foreign governments buying access to the White House through personal financial investments. She attempts to frame the question of ethical oversight as an unpatriotic distraction from public safety.

The Collapse of Lawful Authority

The confrontation ultimately served as a dramatic testament to the erosion of accountability within the DOJ. When an Attorney General refuses to even acknowledge the ethical and national security implications of a foreign government buying billions in a President’s personal crypto product to secure restricted technology, the system is fundamentally compromised.

As Mkeley stressed, the issue is simple: “Democrats and Republicans, want Americans to make American decisions, not foreign influence being bought through crypto coins.”

Bondi’s panicked refusal to address the two distinct, publicly documented scenarios—the memecoin dinner seeking regulatory favors and the stablecoin purchase tied to restricted AI chip exports—makes one thing undeniable: The Justice Department under Pam Bondi is unwilling to even discuss the possibility of foreign influence entering through the President’s personal financial empire. When accountability becomes offensive, the democracy itself is threatened.