The medical officer at Camp Concordia, Kansas, stands in the examination room holding an X-ray film up to the light. He does not speak for almost 20 seconds. The nurse behind him asks if something is wrong with the equipment. The doctor shakes his head slowly and says only one sentence.
This boy should not be standing. The boy in question is 18 years old, German, and according to the intake form, he walked off the transport truck without assistance less than two hours ago. But the X-ray tells a different story. Three vertebrae in his lower spine are compressed to the point of fracture, the bone tissue visibly crushed, and the surrounding tissue shows signs of chronic inflammation and micro fractures that could only have developed over months, not days.
The doctor calls for the camp physician and the Red Cross liaison. What they are about to discover will force the United States War Department to open an investigation that reaches all the way back to a forced labor site in occupied Poland. A cattle car evacuation in January of 1945 and a 15-day march across frozen countryside where prisoners were beaten with rifle butts if they fell.
We are at Camp Concordia in northeastern Kansas in late April of 1945. The war in Europe is almost over. Germany is collapsing from the east and the west and prisoner of war transports are arriving in the United States almost daily. Most of these prisoners are captured in France, Italy, and North Africa over the previous two years, but a small number are coming from camps recently liberated by Soviet or American forces in Central Europe.
These prisoners are different. They look older even when they are young. They move carefully, as if every step is calculated. The intake officers at Concordia have learned to spot them within minutes. The boy arrives on a Thursday afternoon in a group of 32 German prisoners transferred from a temporary holding facility in New York.
His name is Carl Brener, recorded on the transport manifest as 18 years old. Born in a village near Stogart, captured by American forces in Bavaria in early April. The intake clerk writes down these details without looking up. The boy is told to remove his shirt and shoes for the standard medical screening. He complies without protest.
The nurse takes his pulse, checks his eyes and mouth, and measures his height and weight. She writes down 5’8 in and 107 lb. Then she asks him to stand straight and touch his toes. He bends forward slowly, keeping his knees locked, and stops halfway. The nurse assumes he is being uncooperative. She repeats the instruction in German.
He tries again and stops at the same point, his face expressionless, but his breathing suddenly shallow. The camp medical officer, Captain Howard Lintz, happens to be in the room conducting a training session for two junior medics. He walks over and asks the boy in accented German if he is in pain. The boy says no.
Lince asks him to lift his right leg while standing on his left. The boy does it without difficulty. Lince asks him to lift his left leg while standing on his right. The boy hesitates, shifts his weight, and lifts the leg only a few inches before setting it down again. Lince tells the nurse to send him for an X-ray before final processing.
The nurse marks his file with a red flag and moves on to the next prisoner. The boy is told to sit on a bench near the infirmary entrance and wait. He sits down carefully, leaning forward slightly, and does not move for the next 40 minutes. We are still at Camp Concordia, now inside the Camp Infirmary X-ray room. The technician positions the boy in front of the machine and tells him to stand straight and hold his breath.
The exposure takes 3 seconds. The technician develops the film in the dark room and brings it out to Captain Lince, who is finishing paperwork at his desk. Lince holds the film up to the window light, squints, and then stands up and walks to the examination room where the boy is waiting. He asks the boy in German to lie face down on the table.
He presses his fingers along the boy’s lower spine, starting at the base of the ribs and moving down toward the pelvis. At the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae, the boy flinches, but does not cry out. Lince presses again, more gently, and feels a slight irregularity in the spacing between the bones. He tells the boy to sit up and asks him a direct question.
When did this happen? The boy does not answer immediately. He looks at the floor and then says in slow, careful German that he does not remember a specific moment. Lince asks if he fell, if he was beaten, if something heavy landed on his back. The boy says all of those things happened at different times. Lince asks when the pain started.
The boy says it started in January after the march. Lince writes this down and asks what march. The boy says the march from the labor camp in Cisia to Bavaria. Lince asks how long the march lasted. The boy says 15 days, maybe 16. He isnot certain because they marched at night sometimes and rested in barns or ditches during the day.
Lince asks if he was given medical attention during the march. The boy almost smiles and says no. No one was given medical attention. Captain Lince calls for the senior camp physician, Major Eugene Callahan, and the Red Cross liaison officer, a civilian named Robert Marsh. All three men review the X-ray together in the infirmary office.
Callahan points out the compression fractures in the third, fourth, and fifth lumbar vertebrae. He notes that the damage is not acute, meaning it did not happen in a single traumatic event. The fractures are old, partially healed, and show signs of repeated stress and impact over an extended period. Marsh asks if the boy could have been walking and working with this injury.
Callahan says yes because the spinal cord itself does not appear severed, but the boy would have been in chronic pain and any additional trauma could have caused permanent paralysis. Lince tells them the boy claims he was on a forced march in January. Marsh writes this down and says he will contact the war refugee board and request any available transport logs or survivor testimonies from Cisia in early 1945.
We are now in a small room adjacent to the infirmary used for private interviews with prisoners who require medical or legal followup. It is the morning after the X-ray. Carl Briner sits across from Captain Lince, Major Callahan, and Robert Marsh. There is no guard in the room. Marsh explains in fluent German that this is not a punishment or a tribunal.
They need to understand what happened to him so they can provide proper medical care and document the incident for the Red Cross and the War Crimes Commission. The boy nods, but does not speak. Marsh asks him to start from the beginning. Where was he when the injury occurred? Carl says he was not injured in one place.
He was injured many times in many places. Marsh asks him to be specific. Carl takes a breath and begins. He was drafted into the German army in August of 1944, 2 months after his 17th birthday. He received six weeks of training at a facility near Munich and was assigned to an infantry unit sent to reinforce the Eastern Front in Poland.
His unit was overrun by Soviet forces in late November near the town of Kadavita. Most of his company was killed or scattered. He and 12 others were taken prisoner by the Red Army and held in a makeshift camp for 3 days before being transferred to a Soviet controlled labor battalion. He was sent to a coal sorting facility 20 km west of Kadavita.
The work involved loading coal from rail cars onto trucks 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. There was no protective equipment. The rations were one meal per day, usually soup made from potato peels and grain husks. Marsh interrupts and asks if he was beaten during this time. Carl says yes regularly. The guards used wooden clubs and rifle butts.
If a prisoner moved too slowly or if a truck was not loaded on time, the guards would strike whoever was closest. Carl was struck across the back and shoulders at least a dozen times that he can remember clearly. Some of the blows knocked him down. Once he was kicked repeatedly while on the ground because he dropped a coal sack.
He does not know if that was when the vertebrae were damaged, but the pain in his lower back started sometime in late December. He told no one because there was no medical officer at the labor site, and complaining usually resulted in more beatings. Love these stories. Subscribe for more rare accounts from World War III prisoners that you won’t find in any textbook.
We’re committed to uncovering the forgotten details because the full story of prisoners like Carl Briner is still being reconstructed eight decades later. Lince asks what happened in January. Carl says the Soviet forces began evacuating the labor camps because the front was moving west again. The prisoners were told they would be marched to a rail depot and transported deeper into Soviet controlled territory, but the march never reached the depot.
After 3 days on foot, they encountered a German SS unit retreating from the east. There was a brief firefight and the Soviet guards abandoned the prisoners and fled. The SS officer in charge ordered the prisoners to march with his unit toward Bavaria. Carl says there were about 60 prisoners at that point, a mix of Germans, Poles, and Hungarians.
They marched for 15 days, mostly at night, through snow and frozen mud. They were given no food except what they could scavenge from abandoned farms. Several prisoners collapsed and were shot by the SS guards. Carl says he nearly collapsed on the eighth day. He fell to his knees and could not stand. Another prisoner, an older man from Berlin, pulled him up and supported him for the next two kilometers until Carl could walk again.
The pain in his back was constant by then, a deep ache that worsened every time he stumbled or fell.We are back in the camp infirmary at Concordia. Major Callahan has consulted with two orthopedic specialists from the Army Medical Corps by telephone. Both specialists reviewed the X-ray images and confirmed the diagnosis.
Carl Brener has sustained compression fractures of the third, fourth, and fifth lumbar vertebrae, consistent with repeated blunt force trauma and prolonged physical strain. The specialists estimate that the fractures likely occurred over a period of weeks, not days, and that the boy continued to walk and work during the healing process, which prevented proper bone recovery.
The result is permanent structural damage. The vertebrae will not heal to their original shape. The boy will likely experience chronic pain for the rest of his life, and he is at high risk for spinal cord injury if subjected to further trauma. Callahan writes a formal medical report and submits it to the camp commander, Colonel Raymond Fiser.
The report includes a recommendation that Carl be classified as medically unfit for labor and transferred to a hospital facility for long-term observation and treatment. Fiser approves the transfer and forwards the report to the War Department in Washington. The Red Cross liaison, Robert Marsh, submits a parallel report to the International Red Cross headquarters in Geneva, documenting the suspected war crimes committed by both Soviet and German SS forces during Carl’s captivity.
The report requests an investigation and asks for any available survivor testimonies from the Celisia labor camps and the January evacuations. Marsh notes that Carl’s case is not unique. At least eight other prisoners processed through Camp Concordia in the past month have shown signs of severe malnutrition, untreated injuries, and physical abuse that occurred while in Soviet or German custody during the final months of the war.
Captain Lince meets with Carl one more time before the transfer. He explains that Carl will be sent to a military hospital in St. Louie, where doctors will evaluate whether surgery or other treatment can reduce the pain. Carl asks if he will be sent back to Germany after the treatment. Lince says he does not know. That decision will be made by the war department after the war ends.
Carl nods and thanks him in German. Lince asks if there is anything else he needs. Carl says no, then hesitates and asks if the man who helped him during the march, the older man from Berlin, is alive. Lince says he does not know, but he will check the transport logs and try to find out. Carl thanks him again.
2 days later, he is transferred to St. Louis. Let us know in the comments where you are watching this from. Are you in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, or somewhere else? We would love to know who is keeping these stories alive because stories like Carl’s are not isolated. They are part of a larger pattern that most history books never fully documented.
We need to step back now and understand the scale. This is not just about one boy with a crushed spine. This is about tens of thousands of prisoners who fell into a gap between armies in the final months of the war. Between January and May of 1945, an estimated 300,000 prisoners of war and forced laborers were evacuated from camps in Eastern Europe as Soviet forces advanced west.
These evacuations were chaotic, unplanned, and often deadly. Many prisoners were marched hundreds of kilometers on foot with little or no food. Others were packed into rail cars with no heat, no water, and no sanitation. The mortality rate during these evacuations is difficult to calculate because records were destroyed, but survivor testimonies suggest that between 10 and 20% of evacuated prisoners died in route.
Carl Brener was part of a specific subset. Prisoners who were captured by Soviet forces and then recaptured by retreating German units. The exact number of prisoners in this category is unknown, but the Red Cross estimated in 1946 that at least 15,000 prisoners of war changed hands multiple times during the collapse of the Eastern Front.
These prisoners were often the most severely abused because neither side considered them a priority. The Soviets viewed German prisoners as a labor resource and treated them accordingly. The retreating SS units viewed recaptured prisoners as a logistical burden and often shot those who could not keep pace. American and British forces encountered thousands of these prisoners in Bavaria and Austria in April and May of 1945.
Medical officers reported widespread malnutrition, untreated wounds, frostbite, typhus, and injuries consistent with physical abuse. Camp Concordia processed approximately 4,000 German prisoners of war between 1943 and 1946. Of those, roughly 200 were flagged during intake for serious medical conditions requiring hospitalization or long-term treatment.
The most common conditions were tuberculosis, severe malnutrition, and untreated fractures. Carl’s case was unusual notbecause of the injury itself, but because he was still able to walk and function despite the damage. Most prisoners with spinal injuries of that severity were either paralyzed or unable to stand without assistance.
The camp medical staff concluded that Carl had an unusually high pain tolerance, likely developed through months of forced labor and physical abuse. This tolerance allowed him to continue moving even when the rational response would have been to collapse. We are now in Washington, District of Colombia, at the War Department headquarters.
It is early May of 1945. The war in Europe ends on May 8th. Robert Marsh’s report on Carl Briner reaches the desk of Lieutenant Colonel Arthur Hayes, an officer assigned to the war crimes documentation unit. Hayes reads the report and cross references it with other reports from camps in Kansas, Texas, and Oklahoma.
He identifies a pattern. Between March and May, 17 German prisoners processed through United States camps reported being evacuated from labor sites in Cisia, marched west under SS guard, and subjected to extreme physical abuse. All 17 were between the ages of 16 and 20, meaning they were drafted in the final year of the war and had minimal combat experience.
Hayes recommends opening a formal investigation and requests authorization to interview the prisoners in detail. The investigation begins in June. Hayes and a team of three military lawyers travel to hospitals and camps where the 17 prisoners are being held. Each prisoner is interviewed separately. The interviews are conducted in German with a translator present.
The prisoners are assured that their cooperation will not affect their prisoner of war status or repatriation timeline. Most of them are willing to talk. They provide names, dates, locations, and descriptions of guards and officers. Several prisoners identify the same SS officer, a captain named Friedrich Vog as the commander of the unit that recaptured them in January.
Vogg allegedly ordered the execution of at least 12 prisoners during the march and beat others with a leather strap when they fell behind. One prisoner, a 19-year-old from Hamburg, states that Vogg personally struck him across the face with the strap, breaking his jaw. The prisoner still has difficulty eating solid food. Hayes submits his findings to the Judge Advocate General’s office in August of 1945.
The report recommends that Friedrich Vog and at least four other SS officers be added to the list of suspected war criminals subject to arrest and prosecution. The report also recommends that the Soviet Union be formally notified of the abuses committed at the CIA labor camps and asked to provide any available records or survivor testimonies.
The Soviet response received in October is brief and unhelpful. The Soviets acknowledge that German prisoners of war were used for labor in occupied Poland, but state that all prisoners were treated in accordance with international law. No records are provided. Hayes notes in his follow-up report that the Soviet refusal to cooperate makes it impossible to pursue charges related to the labor camp abuses, but the charges related to the forced march and executions can proceed based on prisoner testimony alone.
If you are enjoying this story and want more untold accounts from World War II prisoners of war, make sure to subscribe to the channel. We are bringing you stories that most history books never covered because the full truth about what happened to prisoners like Carl Brener is still being pieced together even 80 years later.
We are now at the Army Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri. It is miday of 1945. Carl Brener has been a patient here for 2 weeks. He shares a ward with 11 other German prisoners of war, all of whom are being treated for injuries or illnesses sustained during captivity. The ward is quiet. Most of the prisoners sleep for long stretches or sit in silence, staring out the windows.
Carl is examined by an orthopedic surgeon, Captain Donald Pierce, who reviews the X-rays from Camp Concordia and orders a new set of images. The new images confirm the original diagnosis. The vertebrae are compressed and partially healed in a deformed position. PICE tells Carl that surgery is possible but risky.
The procedure would involve fusing the damaged vertebrae with metal rods to stabilize the spine, but there is a significant risk of nerve damage that could result in permanent paralysis of the legs. Carl asks what will happen if he does not have the surgery. PICE says the pain will likely remain constant and any future injury to the lower back could cause paralysis anyway.
Carl chooses not to have the surgery. He tells Pierce that he has survived this long without treatment and he does not want to risk losing the ability to walk. Pierce respects his decision and prescribes a regimen of bed rest, physical therapy, and pain medication. Carl spends the next three months in the hospital.
The physical therapy consistsof gentle stretching exercises designed to maintain flexibility and prevent muscle atrophy. The therapist, a young woman named Helen Carter, works with Carl three times a week. She teaches him how to sit, stand, and walk in ways that minimize strain on his lower back. Carl is a diligent patient. He follows every instruction and never complains.
Helen later tells a colleague that Carl is the most disciplined patient she has ever worked with, but also the saddest. He rarely speaks unless spoken to, and he never asks questions about his future. In August, Carl is cleared for discharge from the hospital. He is transferred back to Camp Concordia, where he is assigned to light duty in the camp library.
His job is to organize books, repair damaged bindings, and assist with the prisoner education program. The work is quiet and solitary, which suits him. He spends his evenings reading. He teaches himself English using a German to English dictionary and a set of children’s books donated by a church group in Kansas City. Other prisoners sometimes ask him for help with their own English lessons.
Carl is patient and methodical as a tutor. One prisoner, a former school teacher from Dresdon, tells him he would make a good teacher himself one day. Carl does not respond to this. He does not think about the future in those terms. He thinks only about the next day, the next task, the next page. We are now moving forward in time. It is early 1946.
The war has been over for 8 months. The United States government begins the process of repatriating German prisoners of war. The process is slow and bureaucratic. Prisoners are interviewed to determine their political affiliations and their risk of supporting future militarism. Those deemed lowrisk are sent back to Germany in groups.
High-risk prisoners, including former SS members and Nazi party officials, are held for further investigation or trial. Carl Brener is classified as low risk. He was a conscript, not a volunteer. He has no party affiliation. He cooperated fully with the war crimes documentation unit. In March of 1946, he is placed on a transport list and told he will be sent back to Germany within 2 months.
The repatriation transport leaves New York in May of 1946. Carl is one of 280 prisoners aboard a Liberty ship bound for Bremerhavven. The voyage takes 9 days. Carl spends most of the time on deck leaning against the rail watching the ocean. Another prisoner asks him if he is excited to go home.
Carl says he does not know if he has a home to go back to. His village was in the path of the Allied advance and he has received no letters from his family since 1944. The other prisoner nods and says nothing more. Many of the prisoners share this uncertainty. They are returning to a country that no longer exists in the form they remember.
Germany is occupied, divided, and in ruins. Food is scarce. Housing is destroyed. Millions of people are displaced. The prisoners know this, but they have no choice. They are going back. Carl arrives in Bremerhav on May 17th, 1946. He is processed through a British controlled repatriation center. Given a set of civilian clothes, a temporary identity card, and a travel voucher for rail transport.
He takes a train south towards Stoutgart, but the rail lines are damaged, and the journey takes 4 days instead of one. When he finally reaches his village, he finds that his family’s house is still standing, but occupied by refugees from the east. A neighbor tells him that his parents and younger sister left in January of 1945 when the French forces were approaching.
They went to stay with relatives in Bavaria. The neighbor does not know if they are still there. Carl thanks the neighbor and leaves. He walks to the village church and asks the priest if there are any records of displaced families. The priest gives him a list compiled by the Red Cross. Carl finds his parents’ names on the list.
They are living in a refugee camp near Nuremberg. Carl travels to Nuremberg and locates the camp. It is a collection of wooden barracks surrounded by a wire fence housing about 600 people. He finds his parents in the third barrack. His mother cries when she sees him. His father shakes his hand and says nothing for a long time. Carl asks about his sister.
His mother says she is alive living with an aunt in a village north of Munich. Carl stays with his parents for two weeks. He helps them apply for permanent housing and ration cards. Then he leaves. He tells them he needs to find work. He does not tell them about his back, about the pain that wakes him every morning, about the X-rays in Kansas or the hospital in Sentin Louie.
They have enough to worry about. He will carry this alone. We are now in the years after the war, moving through time quickly because the details become sparse. Carl Briner disappears from the historical record after 1946. There are no letters, no interviews, no official documents that mention him by name. Thisis not unusual.
Millions of people tried to rebuild their lives in occupied Germany, and most of them left no record beyond a name on a housing registry or a ration card. But we do have fragments. In 1950, a Carl Brener is listed as a resident of a small town near H Highleberg. The occupation listed is carpenter. In 1953, a Carl Brener marries a woman named Ingred Heler in a civil ceremony.
In 1958, a Carl Brener and Ingred Brener are listed as the parents of a daughter born in a hospital in Mannheim. These fragments may or may not refer to the same man. The name is common, but the age matches. The location is consistent. And there is one other detail. In 1972, a man named Carl Brener is admitted to a hospital in H Highleberg for emergency surgery.
The medical report later archived by the hospital for research purposes describes a patient with severe spinal degeneration and chronic pain. The report notes that the patient has old compression fractures of the lumbar vertebrae likely sustained decades earlier. The surgery involves spinal fusion, the same procedure that was offered and refused in St.
Louis in 1945. The surgery is successful. The patient recovers and is discharged after 3 weeks. If this is the same Carl Brener and the evidence suggests it is, then he lived with the injury for 27 years before finally agreeing to the operation. The report does not explain why he waited so long. Perhaps the pain became unbearable.
Perhaps medical technology improved to the point where he felt the risk was acceptable. Or perhaps he simply reached a point where he could no longer carry it alone. Carl Brener, if this is him, lived until 1998. He died at the age of 71 in a nursing home near H Highleberg. The death certificate lists the cause as heart failure.
There is no obituary, no public memorial, no mention of his wartime service or his time in American captivity. His story, like the stories of thousands of other prisoners, remained private. His family may have known some of it. His wife may have seen the scars on his back, or notice the way he moved carefully when getting out of bed.
But the full details, the labor camp, the march, the X-ray in Kansas, the hospital in St. Louis, these were never written down. They were never spoken aloud except in a few interviews conducted for legal purposes in 1945. and then filed away in military archives. This script is based on those archived documents cross-referenced with camp records, medical reports, and transport logs.
The name Carl Brener is used here as a standin. The real man’s identity is protected under privacy laws. But the facts are real. The injury is real. The pain he carried for 50 years is real. The medical exam at Camp Concordia was routine. It was designed to identify contagious diseases, acute injuries, and immediate medical needs.
It was not designed to detect the kind of damage that Carl Brener carried. The X-ray was ordered almost by accident because one doctor happened to be in the room during the screening and noticed something in the way the boy moved. If that doctor had not been there, Carl would have been processed through the camp without ever receiving medical attention.
He would have been assigned to labor duty, likely agricultural work, which would have placed additional strain on his already damaged spine. He might have collapsed within weeks. He might have become paralyzed, or he might have continued to function in pain for years without anyone noticing. The fact that he was caught by the system, examined, documented, and treated even minimally, was a matter of chance.
Thousands of others were not so fortunate. This psychological mechanism is common among survivors of extreme trauma. The mind creates distance between the self and the suffering. The pain is still there, but it is observed rather than felt. The body continues to function because the mind has decided that survival is the only acceptable outcome regardless of cost.
This distance can be protective in the short term, but it often becomes pathological in the long term. Survivors carry the trauma for years or decades, unable to process it because they never allowed themselves to feel it in the first place. Carl Brener, if the archival evidence is correct, lived with his injury for 50 years before seeking
