The atmosphere surrounding the Los Angeles Clippers was supposed to be one of triumphant renewal. With a magnificent new arena on the horizon, the arrival of superstars like Kawhi Leonard and James Harden, and a chorus of championship buzz echoing through Southern California, the promise was clear: this was finally the franchise’s time to shine.
Instead, the dream has crumbled into a toxic mixture of chaos, injuries, and profound organizational disappointment. With a brutal 7-19 record—worse than teams actively tanking—the Clippers find themselves trapped in a spiraling, self-inflicted mess. They are cornered, not by a sudden twist of fate, but by a series of compounding, poor decisions that now demand one brutal choice: trade Kawhi Leonard, move James Harden, or face the humiliating admission that the Super Team era is officially dead.

The Quiet Storm: Kawhi Leonard and the $300 Million Question
At the epicenter of this spectacular failure stands Kawhi Anthony Leonard. A talent, no doubt, but his tenure with the Clippers has been the ultimate exercise in disillusionment. He was hailed as the centerpiece, the star whose stoic, two-way brilliance would finally transform the “little brother” franchise into a powerhouse. Instead, he has been branded by critics as “the worst superstar in the sport” who does nothing to promote his team and, more damningly, one of the “worst free agent signings in NBA history.”
On paper, Leonard’s individual output remains elite. He is still putting up impressive numbers, averaging 25.4 points, 5.5 rebounds, and three assists on nearly 49% shooting. These are the statistics of a franchise cornerstone. Yet, when viewed against the team’s miserable performance, those numbers merely underscore the depth of the organizational dysfunction. The Clippers are spending superstar money for tank-level results, a brutal irony best captured by their woeful start to the season.
The financial reality is staggering. Leonard has been paid over $300 million since arriving in a Clippers uniform. Furthermore, he has only managed to play 277 games out of 492 total, a testament to the unreliable availability that has plagued the team’s aspirations since day one. The quiet storm that is Leonard’s tenure has not just shaken the franchise—it has fundamentally destabilized it. Now, with the team sitting on a monumental contract and Leonard currently in the first year of a $153 million extension, his trade value is severely compromised. The injury history, coupled with an ongoing organization-wide investigation, makes any potential deal tricky, leading several league executives to whisper the unthinkable: Kawhi Leonard’s contract might actually be a negative value deal.
The Phantom Curse: The Crippling Paul George Trade Trap
To truly grasp the depth of the Clippers’ predicament, one must rewind to the summer of 2019. Leonard, in making his decision to join the Clippers, laid down a non-negotiable demand: the franchise had to acquire another superstar, specifically Paul George. Desperate to secure Leonard’s commitment, the Clippers paid an astronomical price to the Oklahoma City Thunder (OKC): five first-round draft picks, two pick swaps, and the promising young guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (SGA).
That disastrous trade is the curse that now hangs over the entire organization. The failure to secure a title—or even a consistent Finals appearance—means the debt remains due, and the price is crippling.
![]()
The Clippers’ future is no longer their own. The Oklahoma City Thunder own LA’s unprotected 2026 first-round pick and control the 2027 pick swap. To make matters even messier, the fallout from subsequent desperate moves—including the short-lived Bradley Beal saga and the eventual James Harden maneuvering—has resulted in the Philadelphia 76ers holding the Clippers’ unprotected 2028 pick and another swap in 2029.
This means the Clippers do not control a single first-round pick until 2030.
This is the heart of the nightmare. The classic organizational escape route—the “blow it up and tank” rebuild—is entirely off the table. If the Clippers lose now, they are not helping their future; they are merely handing shiny new prospects straight to their rivals in OKC and Philly on a silver platter. They are fundamentally trapped in a lose-lose game. They cannot tank, yet they are performing at a tanking level.
The Front Office Follies: A Season of Self-Inflicted Wounds
The crisis is not just on the court; it stems directly from a front office that has convinced itself it was playing 5D chess while the rest of the league was playing checkers. Their “long game” was to simply ride out the massive contracts and survive the debt owed to OKC until 2027, resetting once the books cleared. That vision has turned into an expensive, humiliating disaster.
The list of self-inflicted wounds is extensive:
The Beal Blow-Up: The wave-making signing of three-time All-Star Bradley Beal in July had the league buzzing, only for disaster to strike before he even suited up. Beal was ruled out for the entire season with a brutal hip injury just weeks later.
The Chris Paul PR Nightmare: In a tone-deaf and clumsy move, management publicly embarrassed a franchise legend by trading 40-year-old Chris Paul in the middle of what was supposed to be his classy farewell tour. This demonstrated a stunning lack of organizational awareness and further damaged the team’s reputation.
The collective impact of these failures has sunk the Clippers’ reputation right back to the “poverty franchise” label they worked for years to shake off. The front office, led by Lawrence Frank, is being relentlessly roasted for clumsy decisions, leading to the harsh, logical conclusion: “These guys are bad at their jobs.” Owner Steve Ballmer’s wild, celebratory enthusiasm has been replaced by the quiet anxiety of a man who spent billions only to be haunted by the ghosts of a reckless trade.
The Impossible Dilemma: Trading Pain for Survival

With their backs against the wall, the front office has no choice but to confront the questions they have dodged for years. The ultimate questions now revolve around who goes first: Harden or Kawhi?
Option A: Trading Kawhi Leonard
The unthinkable is on the table: sending their biggest name packing. While Leonard still produces like a star, his contract and injury history make a trade “almost impossible.” Teams are wary of taking on a $50-plus million player with unpredictable availability, especially under the league’s new CBA rules.
Still, desperate teams exist. Miami is often whispered as a landing spot, with the hope that “Heat Culture,” Erik Spoelstra’s brutal conditioning, and a non-nonsense system could squeeze one final playoff run out of his knees. The New York Knicks, perpetually chasing a redemption story for a wounded star at Madison Square Garden, also possess the assets to make a deal tempting. However, the reality is that the return would not come close to matching his perceived value five years ago. It would be an embarrassing, low-value trade—the painful acceptance of a failed experiment.
Option B: Trading James Harden
Moving Harden is, on paper, the most realistic option. His contract is lighter, his health has held up better, and his skill set as a scoring spark and playmaker still holds real value for contenders. Imagine Harden running plays next to Giannis Antetokounmpo and Damian Lillard in Milwaukee—that trio would be terrifying. Even a young, defensive team like Orlando could make sense, gaining a veteran presence to steer their offense.
Some insiders are convinced the Clippers will flip Harden instead of touching Leonard. This route offers the ability to reshape the roster with complementary pieces, unlike trading Kawhi, which would yield almost nothing of substance.
The Messy Middle Path: Choosing the Path of Least Hurt
The Clippers have reached a point where every path forward hurts, and the only thing worse than making the wrong move is standing still. The standings are screaming the truth: this team is no longer built to win, and their opponents can smell the desperation.
The classic blow-it-up plan is entirely off the table because of the draft pick liabilities. They cannot fake it, and they cannot ignore the mess. This leaves only one viable choice: the “messy middle path.”
This path dictates keeping Kawhi Leonard, not because they believe he will return to his 2019 form, but because trading him now yields too little and still leaves the team without a true star. Losing with him might still be better than losing without him. The focus, therefore, must shift to trading James Harden for what the team truly lacks: depth, defense, and energy.
Reshaping the roster by replacing Harden’s minutes with hungry young legs, acquiring a true rim protector, and gaining athletic wings would not turn them into instant contenders, but it could make them functional, balanced, and stable again. The goal is no longer success, as that choice is gone. The goal is to pivot with pride, finding the path that hurts least, and regaining an identity before the 2030 first-round pick finally gives them control of their destiny again.
Lawrence Frank now sits at his desk facing the most consequential decision of his career. Does he double down on the fading promise of Leonard, or take the embarrassment of a low-value trade to secure the assets that can stabilize the franchise? The Clippers cannot rewind time, and they cannot pretend that their star is still an unstoppable force. All they can do now is find the least painful path through the next five years of guaranteed misery.