US News LIVE: Barack Obama Faces Mounting Questions as Tulsi Gabbard Teases Major Announcement Following Donald Trump Order

Treasonous Conspiracy Unveiled: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Releases Declassified Evidence Implicating Obama in “Manufacturing” Russia Hoax

In a press conference that will likely be remembered as a turning point in American political history, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled a massive trove of declassified documents that she claims proves a coordinated, treasonous conspiracy led by former President Barack Obama. Standing alongside White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt, Gabbard presented nearly 200 pages of evidence suggesting that the “Russia collusion” narrative was not a result of legitimate intelligence gathering, but a manufactured “fake” assessment designed to subvert the 2016 election and undermine the subsequent Trump administration .

The Core of the Allegations
The documents, released on a Friday as part of a directive from President Trump, point toward a systematic effort by the Obama administration to create a “manufactured intelligence assessment.” Gabbard was explicit in her language, stating that the evidence “directly points to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment” . She described the subsequent years of investigations and media firestorms as a “years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy” against the American people and the republic .

According to the DNI, the intelligence released shows that the Russian government’s actual motives were to “sow discord and chaos” within the U.S. election, a far cry from the narrative that they had a specific preference for Donald Trump. Gabbard alleges that the Obama administration deliberately altered this conclusion to suggest a preference for Trump, thereby delegitimizing his victory before he even took the oath of office .

Refuting Previous Investigations
When questioned about previous bipartisan investigations—such as the Senate Intelligence Committee report and the Justice Department’s own inquiries—which found no evidence of political interference, Gabbard challenged the media to “conduct honest journalism” and look at the new evidence for themselves. She emphasized that this new trunche of documents includes comments from senior intelligence professionals, some of whom are still working within the agencies today, that confirm the intelligence was politicized and contrived .

“I’m not asking you to take my word for it,” Gabbard told the gathered press. “Look at the evidence and you will know the truth” .

A Web of Deceit
The White House has been quick to name those they believe were complicit in this “scandal of the century.” Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt listed former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, and former FBI officials James Comey and Andrew McCabe as central figures in the “scam” . Leavitt criticized major news networks for hiring these individuals as analysts, allowing them to “continue to spew these lies knowing that they are lies” while the country was embroiled in a scandal perpetuated by the Democrat party .

The administration also pointed to figures like Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton, and Elizabeth Warren, accusing them of repeatedly telling the American public that Donald Trump was a “Russian asset” while knowing there was no evidence to support such a claim . The “Steel Dossier,” which Leavitt described as being “cooked up and paid for by the Clinton campaign,” was cited as the primary tool used to ignite the “witch hunt”.

Weaponization and Accountability
The discussion inevitably turned to the “weaponization” of the government. Gabbard, a long-time opponent of using federal power against political rivals, responded to critics who suggested that investigating a former president is itself a form of weaponization. She called such attacks “disrespectful to the American people,” arguing that the true weaponization occurred when the integrity of the republic was undermined by the “manufactured fake intelligence document”.

Leavitt added that no one has been a greater victim of this weaponized system than President Trump, citing the raid on his home at Mar-a-Lago and the various court cases he has been forced to navigate . The President’s stance is clear: he wants all those who “betrayed our country and the Constitution” to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable by the Department of Justice, now led by Attorney General Pam Bondi .

International Impact and Trade Success
While the domestic scandal dominated the headlines, the briefing also highlighted significant wins on the international stage. In just one day, President Trump announced major trade deals with the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan . The centerpiece of these deals is an agreement with Japan, which has committed to a staggering $550 billion in investments to revitalize American industries, including semiconductors, energy, and shipbuilding .

Leavitt emphasized that the President is “finally putting a stop to our country getting ripped off,” using tariffs as a negotiating tool to force foreign markets to open to American-made products . This economic progress, combined with reported record-low murder rates and a surge in domestic energy production, was framed as the fulfillment of campaign promises made just six months ago .

The AI Race and Global Peace
The briefing concluded with a look toward the future. President Trump is set to announce a comprehensive “AI Action Plan” to ensure American dominance in the field of Artificial Intelligence, a move the administration deems “non-negotiable” for national security . Furthermore, the administration touted the President’s peacemaking efforts, including three Nobel Peace Prize nominations for his work in brokering ceasefires and ending conflicts such as the war between Israel and Iran .

However, the shadow of the Gabbard report looms over these accomplishments. As the 200 pages of declassified documents circulate, the nation faces a reckoning with its recent past. The referral of these documents to the FBI and DOJ marks the beginning of a legal and political battle that could see a former president in the crosshairs of a criminal investigation for the first time in history.