Stephen A. Smith EXPOSES the WNBA For Alleged Bribe to Hide Brittany Griner’s Real Gender: The Scandal That Could Destroy the League
Stephen A. Smith is never one to bite his tongue, but even he seemed hesitant when he first approached the topic: the WNBA, Brittany Griner, and the rumor that could shatter the foundation of women’s basketball. “We tried the quiet route. Now it’s about bringing noise and putting a spotlight on this,” he said. Usually known for his sharp takes and viral soundbites, Stephen A. found himself at the center of a story far bigger than any normal sports controversy.
It started, as so many things do in today’s world, with whispers: “What are the WNBA and its leadership afraid of?” According to sources swirling around the league, Stephen A. Smith was allegedly offered hush money to steer clear of the Brittany Griner gender controversy—a rumor he now claims is more than just gossip. If true, it wouldn’t just be an ethics issue—it could unravel the league itself, bringing years of speculation into the unforgiving light.
Brittany Griner’s gender has been a point of online conspiracy for years. Fans—sometimes in bad faith—cited her size, strength, and on-court dominance as evidence she couldn’t possibly be the same as her peers. Every time Griner dunks, clips surge online and the rumors reignite. It isn’t helped by the odd interview where she jokes about being called “Pops” or being directed towards the men’s restroom. The league’s efforts to downplay these incidents only fan the flames, giving conspiracy theorists more ammunition.
But why would the WNBA allegedly try to buy off Stephen A.? Simple—his voice carries weight. Every time he supports Indiana’s Caitlin Clark, calls out bullying on the court, or drags the league for letting resentment fester—those words trend. Every time he points out that Clark single-handedly changed the charter flight policy and attendance numbers, it draws millions of views. Stephen A. shapes public perception, and the league knows it.
That’s why the stakes are so high, especially as Griner returns from Russia where she was imprisoned. Even as Americans celebrated her return, questions lingered: Was she truly a role model? Was the league protecting her, or simply protecting its bottom line? Griner’s own controversies—like being caught on video using a slur—only made things worse, with the WNBA appearing to hide bad press rather than confront it.
And then, the real battles began. On ESPN, YouTube, and his podcast, Stephen A. didn’t just attack Clark’s detractors—he challenged the league’s entire power structure. He clashed on-air with Monica McNutt, saying he’s been backing women’s basketball since long before Clark, that he calls out the league because he wants the best for it. He even called out WNBA legend Sue Bird, calling her defense of the league’s ratings “disgusting,” and pointed to the fact that, even with Clark, the league still lost $40 million last year.
But for all his outspokenness, there’s one subject Stephen A. has inched up to, but never crossed the line to say clearly: the truth about Brittany Griner. Instead, he’s left breadcrumbs—hinting that larger, more explosive revelations may be coming. Some fans wonder if it’s out of loyalty: when Griner returned from Russia, Stephen A. publicly supported her, asking for understanding of her emotional and mental struggles. But patience only stretches so far when the league that claims to stand for equality is seen as hiding truth to maintain profit or “protect” a star.
Why not just say it? It’s as much political as personal. If Stephen A. made such an accusation head-on, the backlash would be severe. Sponsors might drop him. Activists would attack him as bigoted, even if he had evidence. The entire focus of the story would change—from the truth of Griner’s gender to attacks on Smith himself. Meanwhile, if the WNBA crumbles under a scandal, so too do Disney, ESPN, and even the NBA, which is more integrated with its sister league than “casual” sports fans realize.
Meanwhile, cracks in WNBA unity are already showing. At this year’s All-Star Game, players staged a protest for fair pay, wearing shirts that read “Pay Us What You Owe Us.” Union leaders like Breanna Stewart and Natasha Cloud called the league’s pay offers disrespectful; talk of a lockout is in the air. All of this comes as investors start to worry: if the league can’t control its image, can it control its future?
Backstage, Stephen A. hints that he’s waiting for the right moment. Maybe one more controversy—another rough play, another heated comment—will be the spark. Then, he won’t be the villain starting trouble, but the truth-teller connecting dots the league tried desperately to hide. If that moment comes—and if Smith names names and brings receipts—then the WNBA will be fighting for more than its reputation. It will be fighting for its survival.
Because in the world of sports and media, secrets rarely stay buried for long. And if Stephen A. Smith finally decides to blow this story open, the fallout won’t be limited to just the WNBA. It will hit everyone involved—the league, its partners, and the entire conversation about what women’s basketball is, and could become, in America.
Play video: