The Hunter Hess situation at the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan has escalated into a heated national debate about patriotism, representation, and politics in sports.
What began as comments from U.S. freestyle skier Hunter Hess has now drawn sharp responses from high-profile figures, including NHL star Matthew Tkachuk, turning a quiet controversy into a viral spectacle.
The drama kicked off when freestyle skier Hunter Hess, a member of Team USA, spoke candidly in interviews about representing the United States amid ongoing domestic political tensions. Hess stated that wearing the American flag brought up “mixed emotions” and emphasized that competing under Team USA colors did not mean he endorsed “everything that’s going on in the U.S.” He noted, “It’s a little hard. There’s obviously a lot going on that I’m not the biggest fan of, and I think a lot of people aren’t.”
These remarks, made in the context of broader discussions among athletes about patriotism, policies, and national divisions, quickly drew backlash. Critics accused Hess of being ungrateful or unpatriotic for expressing nuance while competing on the global stage.

The controversy intensified when former President (and current President in 2026 context) Donald Trump weighed in publicly on social media. In a post on Truth Social (also referenced across platforms like X), Trump labeled Hess a “real Loser,” writing: “U.S. Olympic Skier, Hunter Hess, a real Loser, says he doesn’t represent his Country in the current Winter Olympics. If that’s the case, he shouldn’t have tried out for the Team, and it’s too bad he’s on it. Very hard to root for someone like this. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
Trump’s comments amplified the story, sparking calls from some quarters for boycotts or even questioning Hess’s place on the team.
Adding fuel to the fire, Florida Panthers forward and Team USA hockey player Matthew Tkachuk—known for his outspoken style on and off the ice—publicly called out Hess in what has been described as a national report or media coverage. Tkachuk reportedly urged Hess to “Get out of America for good,” framing it as a response to what he and others saw as disrespect toward the country during the Olympics. This blunt statement aligned Tkachuk with a wave of conservative praise for athletes who express unequivocal pride in representing the U.S.

Tkachuk’s brother, Ottawa Senators captain Brady Tkachuk, echoed similar sentiments during Team USA hockey preparations and games. Brady described representing the U.S. at the Olympics as “one of the greatest honors” of his life, saying he was “truly grateful to be here and represent the red, white and blue.” The brothers’ positive, unapologetic patriotism—highlighted in White House social media posts and media coverage—stood in stark contrast to Hess’s remarks, positioning them as counterpoints in the debate.
Hess didn’t stay silent. In response to the mounting criticism—including Tkachuk’s pointed demand—he fired back with a sassy social media message (details circulating in reports and posts). While the exact wording varied in retellings, Hess pushed back against calls to leave or revoke his status, defending his right to hold complex feelings about his country while still competing proudly as an American athlete. His reply was seen by supporters as a sharp, unfiltered retort that refused to back down amid the pressure.
![]()
This isn’t an isolated incident. The 2026 Winter Games have seen other U.S. athletes navigate similar questions about what it means to represent a polarized nation abroad. The Tkachuk brothers, fresh off strong showings (including family assists in hockey wins), have been celebrated by some as ideal representatives—especially after high-profile moments like their contributions to Team USA’s opener.
The episode highlights ongoing tensions: freedom of expression versus expectations of unity in international competition. For Hess, it’s become a test of handling public scrutiny; for figures like Tkachuk, it’s an opportunity to rally around national pride.
As the Olympics continue, this “wild turn” serves as a reminder that even on the slopes and ice, politics and personal views can collide spectacularly. Whether it fades or escalates further may depend on how the athletes—and the public—move forward from here.