For nearly three decades, the murder of Tupac Shakur has hovered over hip-hop like an unhealed wound. It is a story retold so many times that many thought there was nothing left to uncover. But now, in a moment that has reignited one of the darkest chapters in music history, comedian Katt Williams has thrown gasoline on the fire—claiming there is footage, testimony, and context so explosive that Netflix allegedly refused to touch it.
The footage, according to insiders and longtime critics, was meant to be part of the much-discussed Diddy documentary. Instead, it was quietly left on the cutting room floor. And what it contains, Williams suggests, could radically alter how the world understands Tupac’s death—and who stood in the shadows behind it.
Williams has never been known as a man who chooses his words carefully. But when it comes to Diddy and Tupac, his tone shifts. It becomes deliberate. Measured. Almost ominous. In interviews resurfacing from as far back as 2014, Williams repeatedly hinted that the truth was known by a small group of people—and that accountability would never come.
“Nobody would ever be held responsible,” he once said. At the time, the line felt like a broad criticism of the system. Today, with renewed focus on Diddy’s past and present legal troubles, it lands very differently.
The Netflix documentary, produced amid massive anticipation, did not shy away from controversy. It explored alleged connections between Diddy and the deaths of Tupac Shakur and The Notorious B.I.G., weaving together interviews, archival footage, and insider accounts from the violent 1990s hip-hop scene. Yet according to 50 Cent, who has been vocal about the project, the series barely scratched the surface.
“There are around 140 hours of footage that never made it in,” he claimed.

Among the material reportedly cut was deeply sensitive content—relationships, financial dealings, and personal dynamics that tied Diddy closer to Tupac’s world than previously acknowledged. One particularly explosive detail involved Diddy fathering a child with a woman who had once been romantically linked to Tupac. The fact was confirmed, but ultimately excluded, allegedly for pacing and legal reasons.
Katt Williams insists that what he holds goes far beyond that.
He claims to possess unseen footage, testimonies, and firsthand accounts that would force viewers to reconsider everything they think they know about Tupac’s final years. According to Williams, Netflix’s refusal wasn’t about storytelling—it was about risk.
Because the deeper the story goes, the darker it becomes.
At the heart of this controversy is an idea that has haunted hip-hop culture for decades: that Tupac’s death was not random, not purely gang-related, and not simply a tragic byproduct of East Coast–West Coast rivalry. Instead, critics argue it was the result of jealousy, obsession, power, and silence.
Gene Deal, Diddy’s former bodyguard, has stepped back into the spotlight with claims that further blur the line between rivalry and fixation. According to Deal, Diddy’s relationship with Tupac was far more complicated than the public ever realized. It wasn’t just about music. Or territory. Or image.
It was personal.
Deal alleges that whenever Tupac was linked to a woman, Diddy soon appeared in the same orbit. He describes a pattern so consistent that coincidence becomes difficult to accept. From romantic partners to fashion choices to public rhetoric, Deal claims Diddy mirrored Tupac—admiring him while simultaneously resenting him.
In Deal’s telling, competition slowly transformed into imitation. And imitation into obsession.
Perhaps most unsettling are accounts suggesting that behind the scenes, the so-called East Coast–West Coast war was far less clear-cut than fans believed. Deal recalls moments when Diddy, Tupac, and Suge Knight crossed paths, spoke calmly, and interacted without visible hostility. These encounters challenge the idea of an all-out cultural war and instead suggest a web of private tensions masked by public narratives.
Then there is the issue of money.
Former LAPD detective Greg Kading, who led the task force investigating Tupac’s murder, has long stated that his findings pointed to a specific chain of events. According to recorded statements and investigative material, Dwayne “Keefe D” Davis admitted that he orchestrated the Las Vegas drive-by shooting that killed Tupac in 1996.
Keefe D claimed that an offer was made—allegedly a million dollars—to eliminate both Tupac and Suge Knight. Only Tupac was killed. Suge survived.
Keefe D later told investigators that he never received the full payment. Others allege that a $500,000 sum changed hands, but never reached him. No paper trail has ever definitively tied the money to Diddy. And that absence of physical evidence remains the strongest shield protecting him.
Still, certain lyrics have fueled suspicion for years.
In a 1999 song, Diddy is heard rapping lines about “dropping a million dollars on someone’s head” and making people “disappear.” To some, it’s just aggressive bravado. To others, it feels uncomfortably specific—especially given the timeline and the rumors swirling around him at the time.
Katt Williams believes these details are not coincidences.
He argues that hip-hop has always hidden truths in plain sight—inside lyrics, jokes, and offhand remarks that only make sense once the full picture is assembled. And according to him, the full picture has never been allowed to come into focus.
Not because it doesn’t exist.
But because it is too dangerous.
Despite decades of rumors, resurfaced interviews, and renewed investigations, Diddy has never been charged in connection with Tupac’s murder. Legal experts point out that without hard evidence—documents, verified transactions, or eyewitness testimony—no case could survive in court.
And yet, within the industry, many quietly refer to it as the worst-kept secret in hip-hop.
Tupac himself seemed to understand the danger of speaking too openly. In a resurfaced 1995 interview, he stated plainly that he believed Diddy was involved in the Quad Studios shooting—but stopped short of public accusation.
“I have proof,” Tupac said. “But that’s between me and him.”
Those words now echo with chilling weight.
According to those close to the case, Tupac noticed something after the shooting—how people avoided him, how familiar faces went silent, how power protected itself. Silence, they argue, became the real weapon.
Which brings the story back to Katt Williams.
He insists he is not seeking revenge, fame, or attention. He says he supports victims, not downfall. But he also believes that lies have expiration dates. And when they expire, the truth does not ask permission.
Netflix may have chosen caution.
But the story, it seems, refuses to stay buried.