What Eisenhower Said When Montgomery Demanded Patton Be Fired After Crossing the Rhine in 36 Hours
.
.
The Race to the Rhine: A Tale of Two Generals
In March 1945, as the war in Europe reached its climactic phase, the fate of nations hung in the balance. Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery had meticulously planned Operation Plunder for months, a massive river crossing operation across the Rhine River that would stand as a testament to British military prowess. This operation was not just a military maneuver; it was a chance to redeem the reputation of British forces after the disastrous Market Garden six months earlier.
Montgomery envisioned a flawless execution. Over 80,000 British and Canadian troops would participate, supported by 5,000 artillery pieces positioned along the western bank of the Rhine, ready to deliver a devastating bombardment. Pontoon bridges were pre-fabricated, and airborne troops were set to drop behind enemy lines to secure key positions. Every detail was calculated with precision, and the timeline was fixed: artillery bombardment at 2100 hours, infantry assault boats launching at 2130 hours, and armor crossing by dawn on March 24th.
But approximately 200 kilometers to the south, another general was contemplating the same river with a different plan. Lieutenant General George S. Patton Jr., commanding the U.S. Third Army, had received orders regarding the Rhine crossing that prioritized Montgomery’s operation. Patton was to advance to the area around Mainz, but he saw an opportunity that could not be ignored. The Germans were weak and disorganized near Oppenheim, and he decided to act on his own initiative.
On the night of March 22nd, Patton launched a surprise crossing at Oppenheim, using canvas assault boats. The Germans were caught completely off guard, and by dawn, Third Army had established a solid bridgehead on the eastern bank of the Rhine. Casualties were remarkably light—fewer than 100 soldiers killed or wounded. Patton had done it. He had crossed the Rhine ahead of schedule, with minimal preparation, and at negligible cost.
News of the successful crossing reached Montgomery just hours before Operation Plunder was set to begin. The British commander was furious. He had meticulously orchestrated every detail of his operation, and now Patton had overshadowed it with a bold, impromptu maneuver. Montgomery felt that Patton’s actions not only undermined his carefully laid plans but also threatened the very fabric of Allied cooperation.
Patton’s crossing was hailed as a spectacular achievement in American newspapers, while Montgomery’s operation, despite its success, would be overshadowed by the audacity of the American general. Montgomery, feeling the sting of humiliation, decided to take action. He would recommend to General Eisenhower that Patton be relieved of command, not as punishment but as a necessary enforcement of military discipline.
Eisenhower faced a difficult decision. He understood Montgomery’s concerns about maintaining order and coordination among the Allied forces, but he also recognized the undeniable results that Patton had achieved. Relieving Patton would create political backlash in the United States, where he was a popular figure, while refusing Montgomery’s request would strain relations between the American and British commanders.
After careful consideration, Eisenhower decided to support Patton, allowing him to remain in command. This decision would not satisfy Montgomery, but it was a pragmatic choice that recognized the importance of results in the final months of the war. As Allied forces continued their advance into Germany, Patton’s audacity and speed would be crucial in exploiting the weakening German defenses.
While Montgomery executed Operation Plunder with precision, Patton’s forces were rapidly advancing, taking advantage of the chaos. The contrast between their approaches was stark. Montgomery’s methodical planning versus Patton’s aggressive tactics created a rivalry that would define their legacies in military history.
As the days progressed, the situation on the ground continued to evolve. Montgomery’s forces faced significant casualties despite their careful preparation. In contrast, Patton’s Third Army continued to push forward with minimal losses, further solidifying his reputation as a daring and effective commander.
Despite the tensions between them, both generals ultimately contributed to the Allied victory in Europe. Operation Plunder succeeded in its objectives, and Patton’s rapid advance into Germany demonstrated the effectiveness of his unconventional tactics. However, the rivalry and differing philosophies of warfare between Montgomery and Patton would linger, leaving a lasting impact on military strategy discussions for years to come.
In the end, the Rhine crossing became a defining moment of the war, showcasing the strengths and weaknesses of both British and American forces. Patton’s audacity and Montgomery’s meticulous planning proved that there was more than one way to achieve victory, even if they could never agree on which approach was superior.
The legacy of the Rhine crossing would be remembered not only for its military significance but also for the personal dynamics between two of the most prominent generals of World War II. As the war drew to a close, the contrasting styles of Montgomery and Patton would serve as a reminder that in the chaos of battle, it is often the unexpected that leads to triumph.
