Angel Reese GOES NUTS After DECLARED WORST Shooter in WNBA History!

Angel Reese Faces Harsh Reality After Ranking at Bottom in WNBA Shooting Efficiency: Rookie Comparison Causes Major Stir

The conversation around this year’s WNBA rookie class has taken a dramatic turn, and the numbers leave no room for debate. While Caitlin Clark, the Indiana Fever’s headline-grabbing rookie, continues to dazzle both on and off the court, her longtime rival, Angel Reese of the Chicago Sky, is making waves for an entirely different reason—unwanted history.

The Most Telling Stat in Basketball

What’s the single skill that separates basketball’s elite from the rest? Experts—and seasoned coaches—agree: shooting efficiency is king. The most recent true shooting percentage numbers are in, and the gap between Clark and Reese is impossible to ignore.

Caitlin Clark currently sits sixth in the entire WNBA with a true shooting percentage of 58.3%, outperforming expectations not just for a rookie, but for any professional player. She stands in elite company with veterans like Jonquel Jones, Brittney Griner, and A’ja Wilson—all multiple-time All-Stars and league MVPs.

In contrast, Angel Reese finds herself dead last among the league’s top 30 scorers with a true shooting percentage of just 46.4%. The difference isn’t just statistical; it’s career-defining.

Hard Numbers, Hard Lessons

True shooting percentage is the gold standard for evaluating a player’s scoring efficiency as it takes into account field goals, three-pointers, and free throws. It’s the truest test of whether a player can translate opportunity into points. In Clark’s case, the answer is a resounding yes. She’s not just keeping pace with the league’s best; she’s outclassing most as a rookie—something veterans spend years striving for.

Clark currently ranks:

6th in true shooting percentage (58.3%)
13th in three-point field goal percentage (33.9%)
4th in two-point field goal percentage
2nd in free-throw percentage (90.9%)

Those are elite numbers, the kind that push teams into the playoffs and turn rookies into household names.

In stark contrast, Reese is:

Last among the top 30 scorers in true shooting percentage (46.4%)
40% on two-point shots
39.5% in effective field goal percentage
Ranked 27th in free-throw percentage among her peers

For a player with Reese’s height and athletic gifts, these numbers are not just disappointing—they’re alarming.

Why Is Efficiency So Crucial?

Much of Reese’s offensive value stems from her ability to finish close to the basket. Yet, she’s converting only 40% of her attempts within five feet—by far the lowest among physical post players in the league. Compare that to dominant bigs like Griner and Wilson, who routinely finish at above 60%, and the gap looks less like a bump in the road than a complete detour.

Film study reveals technical flaws: hurried layups, poor use of the glass, and lack of separation. These are basics that most pros master long before entering the league. Coaches know it. Fans see it. And for the first time in her career, Angel Reese is facing public scrutiny that questions her long-term role as a starter.

A Tale of Two Rookies

What makes this story even more shocking is how similar the hype surrounding Clark and Reese was coming out of college. Both were considered franchise-changing prospects. Now, the numbers tell a different story: Clark isn’t just living up to expectations, she’s exceeding them as one of the most efficient rookies in recent memory. Her shooting creates a ripple effect—opening up teammates, stretching defenses, and making the Fever a nightly threat.

Meanwhile, Reese’s inefficient scoring threatens her time on the court. In a league where every point is precious, coaches simply can’t afford to keep inefficient finishers in the rotation, no matter how popular they are.

Changing the Narrative

The arrival of these efficiency numbers has flipped the rookie conversation upside down. Just months ago, debates raged about who would have the better rookie season. Now, the numbers speak for themselves. Clark is the elite offensive weapon elevating her team, while Reese must confront fundamental flaws that could define—or derail—her young career.

As Clark continues to light up the league, the question for Reese is simple but urgent: Can she fix her efficiency woes before her role in Chicago comes into question?

One thing is clear: in the WNBA, there are no safe bets—and reputation alone doesn’t guarantee you minutes on the floor. As the season unfolds, all eyes will be on Angel Reese to see if she can rewrite her own story.

.
.
.
Play video: