Are Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese OVERHYPED, Brutal Season Ahead
The 2025 WNBA season dawned with a feverish buzz that even the veterans couldn’t ignore. The headlines, the hashtags, the debates on morning talk shows—they all revolved around two names: Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese. Both had lit up college basketball. Both had been immortalized in viral highlights, magazine covers, and sneaker deals before ever playing a minute of pro ball. Now, as rookies, they stood at the center of a storm that promised either glory or heartbreak.
The Weight of Hype
Paige Bueckers stepped into the Dallas Wings’ facility with the poise of someone used to attention. But inside, she felt the pressure coil tight in her chest. She’d heard it all: “Generational talent,” “Savior of the franchise,” “The next Sue Bird.” The Wings needed her to be everything at once—a scorer, a leader, a stabilizer for a team that had just lost its veteran core.
Meanwhile, Angel Reese arrived in Chicago to a different kind of welcome. The Sky fans were hungry for hope after a season of painful rebuilds and roster shakeups. Angel’s name was already chanted in the arena, her jersey sold out in stores. But she could feel the weight behind every handshake, every selfie: “You’re our future.” She was expected to be not just a player, but a symbol—a voice, a leader, a champion.
The Reality Check
The first weeks of the season were a blur. Paige discovered that the WNBA was faster, rougher, and less forgiving than any game she’d played before. Defenders closed out like shadows. Passing lanes vanished in an instant. On nights when her shot didn’t fall, social media exploded with criticisms: “Overrated!” “Is she tough enough?” “Was Dallas wrong to draft her #1?”
Angel’s experience was no gentler. Teams double-teamed her, daring the Sky’s young backcourt to beat them. She fought for every rebound, every inch of space in the paint. But the losses piled up. After a stretch of three straight games where she shot under 40% and the Sky blew late leads, the questions started swirling: “Can she carry a team?” “Is she just a rebounder, or a real franchise player?”
Both women felt the sting of expectation. Every mistake was magnified. Every loss was a referendum on their potential. The league’s veterans, many with championship rings and battle scars, didn’t make it easier. They challenged, trash-talked, and tested the rookies’ resolve at every turn.
The Turning Point
It was a muggy night in Chicago when the Sky hosted the Wings. The media dubbed it “The Rookie Showdown.” Paige and Angel exchanged a quick hug before tip-off, both smiling for the cameras, both hiding their nerves.
The game was a grind. Paige struggled early, turning the ball over twice in the first quarter. Angel battled foul trouble, benched for much of the second half. The crowd groaned. On the bench, Angel watched her teammates get out-hustled, her own frustration simmering. Paige, meanwhile, sat with her head in her hands, the noise of the arena fading into a single, painful thought: “Am I really built for this?”
In the locker room after the game—a narrow Sky win—Angel found Paige sitting alone, scrolling through a barrage of critical tweets. Angel sat down beside her, silent for a moment.
“You know,” Angel said, “they’ll never remember the easy games. Only the ones you fight for.”
Paige looked up, her eyes tired but fierce. “Feels like all we do is fight.”
Angel grinned. “Good. That means we’re learning.”
Lessons in the Fire
The season wore on. Paige and Angel endured losing streaks, media scrutiny, and the relentless grind of travel and back-to-backs. But something changed. They stopped trying to be perfect and started leaning into the struggle.
Paige spent extra hours in the gym with her coaches, breaking down film, working on her decision-making. She learned to trust her teammates, to lead with encouragement instead of just stats. There were still rough nights, but she started stringing together moments of brilliance—clutch threes, slick assists, gritty steals.
Angel, meanwhile, embraced her role as the Sky’s emotional engine. She pulled teammates aside during timeouts, lifted rookies after missed shots, and set the tone with her effort on both ends. She developed a reliable mid-range jumper, forcing defenses to respect her away from the basket. The Sky still lost more games than they won, but the culture began to shift. The team played harder, laughed more, believed again.
The Critics Don’t Know Everything
The noise never fully faded. After every bad game, the “overhyped” label resurfaced. But Paige and Angel learned to tune it out. They found solace in late-night phone calls, in shared jokes, in the knowledge that every great player before them had walked through fire.
Veteran stars reached out with encouragement. “Don’t let them write your story,” one legend texted Paige. “Every champion was doubted once.” Angel’s old coach sent her a note: “Pressure is a privilege. You’re built for this.”
The Real Story
By season’s end, neither the Wings nor the Sky were title contenders. The stat sheets were uneven, the highlight reels peppered with both triumph and failure. But something deeper had taken root.
Paige stood on the court after the final game, sweat-soaked and exhausted, as a little girl in a Wings jersey ran up for an autograph. “You’re my favorite player,” she whispered. Paige smiled, feeling the weight lift. It wasn’t about being perfect. It was about showing up, every night, no matter what.
Angel walked out of the Chicago arena, her bag slung over her shoulder, as fans lined up for high-fives. She saw herself in their eyes—not a superstar, but a fighter, a dreamer, a work in progress.
What Makes a Legend
The critics will say Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese were overhyped. They’ll point to the losses, the rough shooting nights, the missed playoffs. But the real story isn’t written in box scores or hot takes. It’s written in resilience—in the way these two young women faced the fire, learned from it, and refused to let it define them.
Because greatness isn’t built in comfort. It’s built in the seasons that break you, and the courage to return, stronger, for another shot.
And for Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese, this was only the beginning.
Paige Bueckers & Angel Reese in the Same Boat as National Analyst Predicts Bleak WNBA Start for Golden State Valkyries
Paige Bueckers & Angel Reese in the Same Boat as National Analyst Predicts Bleak WNBA Start for Golden State Valkyries
It’s wild to think about, but LSU and UConn haven’t played each other in women’s college basketball for almost a decade. The last meeting was on November 20, 2016, when UConn dominated LSU 76-53, led by 28 points from future WNBA star Katie Lou Samuelson. After that, their paths never crossed. While a Caitlin Clark vs. Angel Reese rivalry stole the spotlight during their college days, a Paige Bueckers vs. Angel Reese showdown never had its moment.
But the wait is over. Now, that matchup is coming to life on the pro stage, albeit not quite as fans had envisioned. Instead of battling for WNBA dominance, both Paige and Angel find themselves in a strange spot—at the center of two franchises fighting just to stay above water.
And that’s the twist. Both the Dallas Wings and the Chicago Sky are loaded with talent, but they’ve also become prime examples of what Rachel, the national analyst on Courtside, called “teams that could float around the playoff bubble all season.” Why? As she explains, “They also had a lot of moving parts this season.” Those “moving parts” are more than just trade rumors or coaching switches. They represent major shake-ups—roster overhauls, star exits, new leadership, and rookies with sky-high expectations.
Let’s start with Chicago. The Sky is in rebuild mode, but not in the way that signals a total collapse. It’s more like a messy renovation. They’ve got a new head coach, returning legends, exciting rookies, and gaping holes to patch up. Courtney Vandersloot is back in the Windy City after two years in New York—a full-circle moment for a franchise icon. Drafted third overall in 2011, Vandersloot helped lead Chicago to its first WNBA title in 2021. She cemented her place in team history as one of the most consistent floor generals the league has ever seen.
But this isn’t 2021. Vandersloot is 35 now. She’s still got the vision and poise, and the team around her? It’s young, unproven, and yet full of promise. But the facts remain: it’s what they lost that’s harder to replace. Chennedy Carter’s departure stings the most. As Rachel put it, “She was a pivotal piece in Chicago.” So, yes, that kind of production doesn’t just get replaced with optimism. “I’m just not sure how this team is going to gel together,” Rachel added, hinting at the lingering uncertainty.
The burden, of course, naturally falls on Tyler Marsh. He’s stepping into his first year as HC, but he’s no stranger to championship basketball. His past work as an assistant coach with the Toronto Raptors and Las Vegas Aces earned him respect. But now? He’s got to build something from scratch.
And then there’s Dallas. Like Chicago, the Wings are riding on potential, but not without turbulence. “They picked up NaLyssa Smith, DiJonai Carrington,” Rachel pointed out, highlighting one of the offseason’s most intriguing roster shakeups. NaLyssa Smith, a top draft pick just a couple of years ago, became the odd one out with the Indiana Fever’s new power duo of Caitlin Clark and Aliyah Boston.
During her stint with the Fever, Smith showed flashes of dominance—averaging 13 points, 7.5 boards, and over 1 assist per game in 2022—but never quite clicked into full star mode. The trade to Dallas gives her a fresh canvas and a chance to be a teammate with her girlfriend, Carrington. If Smith thrives, the Wings’ front office might just breathe a little easier after losing both Satou Sabally and Natasha Howard.
But Dallas has something else going for them—a brand-new franchise centerpiece in Paige Bueckers. “Obviously Paige Bueckers is going into the mix,” Rachel said, and she’s not wrong. Now, the Wings are betting big on her bringing that same magic to the WNBA.
And it might work. Especially alongside Arike Ogunbowale. Last season, defenses keyed in on Arike. Sabally’s shoulder injury limited her to just 15 games, which meant Arike often had to play superhero just to keep the team in games. But this year, Bueckers gives Arike a real scoring partner. “Playing alongside Arike,” as Rachel said, Bueckers brings that versatility—able to attack from deep, slice into the paint, or shake defenders off the dribble.
Still, the Wings are not just banking on talent. They’ve also changed up their leadership. Chris Koclanes is now the HC, stepping into the spotlight after years as a defensive specialist with the Sun and Sparks. He reunites with GM Mike Miller, who brings his own deep résumé as a longtime coach and executive in the league. Together, they’re trying to build something new around Bueckers.
So that’s the picture. Two teams. Two rising stars. Two question marks. But while all eyes are on Reese and Bueckers and whether their teams can figure it out in time, there’s another team looming in the shadows.
Why It Could Be a “Rocky Road” WNBA Start for the Golden State Valkyries
The Golden State Valkyries have generated considerable buzz since their entrance. With record-breaking ticket sales and a trio of exciting rookies—Justė Jocytė, Shyanne Sellers, and Kaitlyn Chen—the expansion squad seems poised to make an impact. However, WNBA analyst Rachel sees potential challenges ahead for the team as they work to build a competitive foundation.
Rachel believes that the Valkyries could struggle in their inaugural season, saying, “They can be a bottom-tier team.” The biggest hurdle? They’re starting from scratch. Without an established team chemistry or proven system, the Valkyries face a steep uphill battle. “What that brand of basketball is going to be, what style of play they are going to have, is yet to be seen,” Rachel explained. This uncertainty could be particularly damaging in the early stages of the season, as other teams fine-tune their rotations, while the Valkyries will still be trying to define their identity.
While Rachel acknowledged that the Valkyries “did do pretty well in the draft,” she also pointed out that success in the draft doesn’t immediately translate into victories on the court. In a league as competitive as the WNBA, rookies face a steep learning curve. Rachel emphasized, “That success in the draft doesn’t magically erase the fact that building a competitive team takes time.” However, Kate Martin and Tiffany Hayes, speaking with Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe in February, did note that players have the opportunity to “set the tone right away to show what we want that to be.” So, until that identity settles in, the team might struggle. After that? Perhaps, their garden will look fuller.
Another complication for the Valkyries is navigating the expansion draft. Thanks to WNBA and CBA rules, they could only select one unprotected player from each of the existing teams, and several teams had more than six protected players due to the “core” designation. This significantly limited their options and added an extra layer of difficulty to the roster-building process.
On the bright side, Rachel believes the Valkyries will develop a passionate fan base. “I do think the Golden State Valkyries are going to have a great fan base… their fans are going to be really excited to watch this team,” she said. However, in a league where experience matters and the pressure to perform mounts fast, excitement alone won’t guarantee success. For the Golden State Valkyries, the road ahead will be rocky, and their journey could start bumpy.
