A professional athlete’s career is hanging by a thread after she publicly celebrated the death of a political rival online. WNBA star Natasha Cloud is accused of spreading vile misinformation and launching unhinged attacks, even targeting the deceased’s grieving friend. The league is silent, but the public is demanding action. Is this the end of her career? The full, shocking story reveals a level of hate that has left millions speechless.
WNBA Star Natasha Cloud’s Career in Jeopardy After “Unhinged” Online Tirade Celebrating Activist’s Death
In an era where the lines between sports, politics, and personal conduct are increasingly blurred, the court of public opinion can be as swift and unforgiving as any referee’s whistle. For New York Liberty and WNBA star Natasha Cloud, a series of shocking and inflammatory social media posts following the tragic death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has ignited a firestorm of controversy, pushing her career to the brink and raising serious questions about accountability in professional sports.
The incident, which has been described by critics as “completely unhinged,” has painted a disturbing picture of a professional athlete seemingly celebrating a political opponent’s demise, spreading dangerous misinformation, and launching deeply personal attacks on those mourning his loss.
The controversy began shortly after the news of Charlie Kirk’s death. Rather than offering condolences or remaining silent, Cloud allegedly took to social media with a barrage of accusations that stunned observers. In a series of now-infamous posts, she claimed that Kirk had “lobbied to be shot in public” and had “literally called for public executions.” These explosive claims, made without verifiable evidence, set the tone for a downward spiral of increasingly erratic online behavior that would capture national attention. For many, the posts were not just a political statement but a grotesque celebration of a man’s death—a man who left behind a wife and two young children.
The situation escalated dramatically when Cloud allegedly shared a doctored image of Kirk’s killer, Tyler Robinson, wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat. The image, intended to frame the killer as a right-wing extremist, was quickly debunked. Reports from law enforcement and journalists, including a Fox News correspondent, confirmed that Robinson was, in fact, a leftist. The FBI was reportedly in contact with Robinson’s transgender partner, a detail that further unraveled the narrative Cloud was attempting to push. Her willingness to spread blatant misinformation in such a sensitive moment was seen not only as irresponsible but as a malicious attempt to sow political division using a tragedy as her platform.
But Cloud’s tirade did not stop there. She soon turned her attention to John Root, a devout Christian and a close friend of the late Charlie Kirk. In a deeply personal and vitriolic attack, Cloud publicly branded Root as “not a Christian” and a “white nationalist Christian spewing racism.” The unfounded accusations were a direct assault on Root’s character and faith. Root, maintaining his composure, publicly challenged Cloud to produce any evidence to substantiate her claims, a challenge she reportedly failed to meet. This targeted harassment of a grieving individual was, for many, the most damning part of the episode, transforming a political disagreement into a cruel and personal vendetta.
As the backlash grew, Cloud’s posts became even more volatile. She posted messages that appeared to threaten violence and civil unrest, including the chilling phrase, “trump that bitch civil war coming.” In another post, she seemed to challenge her critics to a physical altercation, writing, “if y’all start saying Antifa square up.” These statements moved beyond the realm of political commentary and into what many have interpreted as incitement and threats, a dangerous line for any public figure to cross, let alone a professional athlete representing a major league.
Throughout this public meltdown, the WNBA and the New York Liberty have remained conspicuously silent. This inaction has drawn fierce criticism, with commentators pointing out the apparent double standard. In today’s climate, individuals across various professions have lost their jobs for far less offensive online behavior. Critics argue that the league’s failure to condemn or discipline Cloud suggests a tacit approval of her conduct, feeding a narrative that the WNBA itself is a “radical extremist” organization out of touch with mainstream values. This perception, some analysts argue, is a key reason the league has struggled to achieve profitability and broader appeal.
The controversy has now attracted the attention of prominent figures like Robbie Starbucks, an activist known for holding corporations accountable for what he terms “woke” policies and DEI initiatives. Starbucks’ involvement signals that the pressure on the WNBA and its sponsors is likely to intensify, potentially escalating the situation from a social media scandal to a full-blown financial crisis for the league if sponsors begin to withdraw their support.
For Natasha Cloud, the future is uncertain. The calls for her to be reprimanded, suspended, or even banned from the WNBA are growing louder by the day. Her actions have not only tarnished her own reputation but have also put her team and the entire league in an incredibly difficult position. In the digital age, athletes are no longer just players; they are brands, role models, and public figures whose words carry immense weight. Cloud’s “unhinged” tirade serves as a stark reminder that with the power of a platform comes the profound responsibility of wielding it wisely. Whether the WNBA will finally step in and address this controversy remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the fallout from this incident is far from over, and it may very well mark the end of a once-promising career.
